Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and its flaws

legal updates

There is no real benefit to be had defending the indefensible, unless you are a solicitor charging by the hour.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Following the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) consultation paper on “Reforming Competition and Consumer Policy”, which closed in October 2021, it would seem likely that 2022 will see ADR become mandatory across the automotive sector.

If some in the sector already feel unloved and under the cosh now, battered by a raft of consumer orientated legislation fuelling unrealistic consumer expectations and opportunism on an industrial scale, lenders that are all too happy to throw them under the bus to placate customers unreasonable demands, and ombudsman services that often play fast and loose with the facts and relevant law, then with regret that is not likely to improve much if and when ADR is foisted on them from on high by the powers that be, as the default stance for every off beam and crackpot claim that comes their way.

Of course, for most responsible traders, legitimate complaints will be dealt with quickly and efficiently at the earliest opportunity. Indeed, there is no real benefit to be had defending the indefensible, unless you are a solicitor charging by the hour, which is precisely what our members are advised, without fear nor favour, as required.

For those consumers whom are always right, even when they are wrong, ADR is a boon. It gives them yet another and often far from last opportunity, to vent their spleen in the hope and expectation of persuading a self-entitled and quasi-judicial entity of the pre-eminence and inevitability of consumerism. 

Be in no doubt, ADR may be couched as a “benefit” to all concerned but it is rather more of a benefit to consumers and is little more than a form of “access to justice”’ on the cheap and as we all know, cheap is not always good. To coin a much misquoted phrase from the classic sci-fi show Star Trek: “It’s justice Jim but not as we know it.”

In the meantime, the government has its best people on this, assuming they can tear themselves away from the wine and cheese, so what could possibly go wrong?

Watch this space.

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Compulsory mediation – are the courts finally making a decision?

There is a clear motivation for parties to focus on resolution rather than dispute in legal matters.

Alternative Dispute Resolution – between a rock and a hard place

There is still no direct obligation to engage in ADR within the automotive sector either before or during court proceedings. However, responsible traders should be under no illusions about the direction being taken by the courts on this matter.

Mercedes diesel software update leads to NOx sensor fault

Our member now faces a repair bill of almost £700 plus VAT for the cost of a new NOx sensor, which they say is consequential to the Mercedes software update.

Proposals for mediation for Small Claims to become compulsory

The proposals aim to reduce the court backlog and assist with resolving disputes promptly and more cost-effectively.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) – yeh or neh?

The only dealers who legally have to participate in ADR are those who are a member of a Trade Association which makes ADR compulsory.

The Motor Ombudsman confirm they CANNOT provide specific legal advice to Motor Traders

This creates a situation that will put the dealer on the back foot and leave them acting alone.

Exploding the myths of ADR

Will the Motor Trader receive the same service from the The Motor Ombudsman, which it enjoyed through Motorcodes?

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.