Compulsory mediation – are the courts finally making a decision?

legal updates

There is a clear motivation for parties to focus on resolution rather than dispute in legal matters.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Mediation is widely known by all those who have been through the legal process and gives the parties one last chance to settle the matter and avoid the matter being heard in court. For some parties, this is a useful tool to put the matter to bed and move on. However, for some parties, it may be considered a waste of time.

At Lawgistics, we always encourage our members to consider mediation to show the courts that a settlement has been considered and attempted, and in some cases, agreements have been made and the matter discontinued.

However, there has been talk for some time about making mediation compulsory and securing alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a stage of the court process. In 2004, the court made a decision in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust that parties cannot be compelled to mediate and several supporters of this decision have concluded that compulsive mediation is in breach of their human rights. However, this argument was quashed in 2021.

Now, mediation groups who are supporting compulsory ADR are targeting the Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil case that is due to be heard in the Court of Appeal later this year.

Although this case is not concerning the motor trade industry, any decisions made in this case about mediation will no doubt affect the court processes that some of our members go through.

It is unclear whether the parties involved in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil would be arguing for a blanket compulsory ADR scheme or whether the outcome of the case would simply allow judges to order parties to use ADR. However, there is a clear motivation for parties to focus on resolution rather than dispute in legal matters.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Kimberly StickleyTrainee SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

An eventful small claims hearing

Discover how a simple oversight in witness representation and off-screen coaching at a remote hearing can dramatically impact legal outcomes, underscoring the critical need for adherence to procedural rules and proper pre-action conduct in our latest insightful article.

From initial complaint to court claim form – let us help you

You can feel assured that court deadlines are attended to with the required attention and specialism.

Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Location, Location, Mislocation: A costly oversight in court attendance

What the unfortunate Claimants (husband and wife) had not appreciated, was that the hearing was listed for the court at Central London.

Court re-instates a claim because of its own error!

One wonders how many times the courts have made the same error.

To Be or Not To Be Remains the Legal Question

The Claimant had sought to reject a commercial van that he had been using for business purposes but alleged that he was a consumer.

Always Deal with Court Documents

This cost our member an application fee to the court, plus a legal representative at court for the hearing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.