Proposals for mediation for Small Claims to become compulsory

legal updates

The proposals aim to reduce the court backlog and assist with resolving disputes promptly and more cost-effectively.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

On 26 July 2022, the Ministry of Justice published proposals for introducing compulsory mediation services for civil court claims with a value of less than £10,000, known as “Small Claims”.

Currently, the Civil Procedure Rules provide that parties should consider whether negotiation or some other form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) might enable them to settle their dispute without commencing legal proceedings. Parties are also expected to continue to consider the possibility of settling at all times, including after proceedings have been started. An unreasonable refusal to participate in ADR could lead to the court ordering the refusing party to pay additional court costs.

Whilst ADR is not currently compulsory, it is evidently encouraged by the court.

At present, after a claim has been issued, both parties will be given the choice of whether or not to participate in the free Small claims mediation service. A mediation appointment will only be booked if both parties agree to participate in mediation.

The proposed changes would result in a claim being automatically referred to a mediator appointed by HM Courts & Tribunals Services. The Small claims mediation service will be a free hour-long telephone session. Parties do not speak to each other directly. All communication is made through the mediator.

If an agreement cannot be reached by the end of an hour of telephone “ping pong”, then the claim will proceed as normal. If an agreement is reached, the mediator will prepare a legally binding settlement agreement for both parties to sign.

The proposals aim to reduce the court backlog and assist with resolving disputes promptly and more cost-effectively.

The consultation remains open for 10 weeks. Watch this space!

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Katie PlemonsSolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

An eventful small claims hearing

Discover how a simple oversight in witness representation and off-screen coaching at a remote hearing can dramatically impact legal outcomes, underscoring the critical need for adherence to procedural rules and proper pre-action conduct in our latest insightful article.

From initial complaint to court claim form – let us help you

You can feel assured that court deadlines are attended to with the required attention and specialism.

Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Location, Location, Mislocation: A costly oversight in court attendance

What the unfortunate Claimants (husband and wife) had not appreciated, was that the hearing was listed for the court at Central London.

Court re-instates a claim because of its own error!

One wonders how many times the courts have made the same error.

To Be or Not To Be Remains the Legal Question

The Claimant had sought to reject a commercial van that he had been using for business purposes but alleged that he was a consumer.

Always Deal with Court Documents

This cost our member an application fee to the court, plus a legal representative at court for the hearing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.