What is ‘Astroturfing’ and how might it affect me?

legal updates

Research has found that some businesses are ambushing rivals with fake reviews.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Well, ‘it’s just not cricket’ or football for that matter and it’s certainly not sporting!

Research has found that some businesses are ambushing rivals with fake reviews and customers are using the threat of online criticism to win discounts.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has found that 54% of UK adults used online reviews, and many found them valuable. It is estimated that £23bn a year of consumer spending was potentially influenced by online reviews.

However, it discovered cases known as ‘astroturfing’. This is the practice of creating fake grass root reviews on unnamed sites, for example:

  • Businesses writing fake reviews of themselves to boost their ratings on review sites compared with rivals;
  • Firms writing or commissioning fake negative reviews to undermine rivals, for malicious reasons, or for personal gain;
  • Review sites cherry-picking positive reviews;
  • Sites allowing businesses to remedy negative reviews, that go unpublished, meaning a complete picture is not clear to review site users.

Consumers could be unaware that some endorsements in blogs were paid for by business.

In some cases, the payment was made clear in the blog, but in others it was not. An investigation had now been launched into such practices, since the use of paid-for endorsements may be unlawful.

It is recognised that impartiality could be compromised by review sites needing to make money through subscriptions, click-throughs, or selling reputation management services to businesses.

The authority also heard allegations of consumers using reviews to ‘blackmail’ businesses into providing concessions, such as price discounts.

The investigation is ongoing and any evidence of wrongdoing should be brought to the attention of the CMA.

Cable For My CarWe offer free next day delivery* on all EV charging cables when shipped within mainland UK

Stocking only premium EV charging cables, we ensure you experience a stress-free EV charge, over and over, confidently backed by our 2 year warranty. Our premium & reliable charging cables are compliant with EU & UK safety standards. We offer free next day delivery* on all EV charging cables when shipped within mainland UK.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Fake reviews differ from defamatory reviews

Tripadvisor’s latest transparency report identified and removed 1.3m fake reviews last year.

Disclaimers – are these really worth the paper they are written on?

Of course, if someone ignores all valid warnings and suffers injury, then they may only have themselves to blame.

The court finds car dealer partly liable for damage caused by the removal of a sticker!

Due to COVID-19, the court held an Early Neutral Evaluation, a 30-minute telephone assessment of each party’s position.

Defamation – How suing for libel and slander is easier said than done!

All well and good for the rich and famous or organisations with cavernously deep pockets but for mere mortals, that is rarely the answer.

Awarded £25,000 in general damages and Trustpilot ordered to remove review

Perhaps the wide reporting of this case will give malicious reviewers pause for thought.

Dealing with negative online reviews

You should deal with the situation as it is and, offer a solution if there is one.

Misrepresentation? Not without an untrue statement

On the evidence, there was no question that our member had complied with his obligations under the Consumer Rights Act, fully.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.