Selling the Dream vs. Reality: A Legal Perspective on Misrepresentation

legal updates

A misrepresentation is where one party makes an untrue statement which leads a second party to enter a contract with the first party, where the second party incurs a loss.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The P-39 Airacobra was an aerial American Wunderkinde. It was fast, manoeuvrable, and carried the kind of cannon found in a tank. Or at least it was, according to its manufacturer, Bell, when it showed off the aircraft to the British Purchasing Commission during the early years of World War Two.

What Bell didn’t mention was the statistics provided about Airacobra’s performance were based on the prototype. The Airacobra prototype carried none of the armament the production models were intended to carry. The prototype also had a supercharger, which would not be fitted to the planes rolling off the assembly line. The RAF ended up using the plane for one mission while the Australians didn’t even bother with that token effort.

While there’s a lesson here for potential buyers, there’s also one for anyone looking to sell an item. You need to make sure you’re offering an accurate description of the item, lest you be accused of misrepresentation.

A misrepresentation is where one party makes an untrue statement which leads a second party to enter a contract with the first party, where the second party incurs a loss. This doesn’t generally include anything that could be called sales talk or held to be just an opinion. However, anything stated recklessly might still be a negligent misstatement if one party owes a duty of care to another.

Misrepresentation is generally divided into three categories, with the remedies becoming more extensive the more serious the misrepresentation. The first category is innocent misrepresentation, where the misrepresentation was made without any fault by the person or party who made it and they can show a reasonable belief that it was true. The remedy here is merely that the contract between the parties is rescinded.

Negligent misrepresentation occurs when the party making the representation carelessly or without reasonable grounds for believing it to be true. Not only will the other party be able to rescind the contract, but if they can show they relied on the representation and entered into the contract only to incur a loss, they will be able to claim damages.

Finally, there’s fraudulent misrepresentation, which comes under the tort of deceit. This is where the party at fault knowingly makes a false representation or is reckless as to whether it’s true. This representation is relied on by the other party, who relies on it and then suffers a loss due to it being a load of codswallop. Again, the injured party is going to be looking for damages along with consigning the contract to the dustbin.

Even keeping quiet can potentially bring pitfalls. Silence may not be considered a misrepresentation as there is no general duty to disclose facts to the other party that might affect their decision to enter into a contract. If you’ve made a representation and circumstances then change to the point where the representation no longer reflects reality, then failing to tell the other party about the new picture can be construed as a misrepresentation by conduct.

So, be careful of what you say and certainly what you put in print. If you’re ever unsure, give us a call.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Gareth WoodLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Navigating legal remedies for unpaid debts in vehicle repairs

Learn how to safeguard your rights and assets in vehicle repairs with expert insights on managing torts and liens effectively.

Commission Disclosure Court Cases

The majority of the cases where court proceedings have been issued about commission disclosure are because our members have either ignored the correspondence or just decided not to engage with these fine upstanding companies.

Disclaimers – are these really worth the paper they are written on?

Of course, if someone ignores all valid warnings and suffers injury, then they may only have themselves to blame.

The court finds car dealer partly liable for damage caused by the removal of a sticker!

Due to COVID-19, the court held an Early Neutral Evaluation, a 30-minute telephone assessment of each party’s position.

Defamation – How suing for libel and slander is easier said than done!

All well and good for the rich and famous or organisations with cavernously deep pockets but for mere mortals, that is rarely the answer.

Statutory rights as a trader – B2B

Traders are offered protection under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SOGA) and the Misrepresentation Act 1967.

Court success on vehicle with a mileage discrepancy

The Claimant issued proceedings against our member for the full cost of the vehicle and the cost of the repairs by the main dealer for misrepresentation.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.