The criteria for whether a philosophical belief is likely to have protection…

legal updates

ACAS instructed Corby to remove the posts criticising the Black Lives Matter movement, as some employees had found them offensive.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The so called culture wars have given rise to a number of Employment Tribunal cases in respect of treatment based upon belief, the most notable and contentious of late being that gender critical views do amount to a protected belief under the Equality Act 2010. 

Another recent judgement at a preliminary hearing found that holding a view that opposes critical race theory can also be considered a philosophical belief under the Equality Act.

In August 2021, Sean Corby, a senior mediator for ACAS, posted on Yammer, a private workplace communications platform, that critical race theory is divisive because it portrays white people as racist.

Corby argued that a better approach to addressing racism was to follow the ideas of Martin Luther King, who said that people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin.

Some of Corby’s colleagues complained to managers that his comments demonstrated “a deep-rooted hatred towards black and minority ethnic people who challenge racism, organise in black structures and safe spaces and mobilise against racism” and were “promoting racist ideas”.

They added that they would not feel “safe to be in contact with him in person” and questioned his right to be employed by ACAS, who facilitate mediation before claims can be made to the Employment Tribunal. 

ACAS instructed Corby to remove the posts criticising the Black Lives Matter movement, as some employees had found them offensive.

Corby, felt his employer was acting “like East Germany”  and took ACAS to the Employment Tribunal, claiming unlawful discrimination on the grounds that his views were protected under the Equality Act 2010.

At a preliminary hearing last month, the employment judge agreed with Corby’s on the basis that he had given his beliefs “careful consideration and much thought”, stating in the judgement that;  

“The claimant’s beliefs relate, in essence, to the best way of eliminating racism in society, and are clearly worthy of respect. They cannot be described as incompatible with human dignity or conflicting with the fundamental rights of others, even if they are not universally shared and were objected to by some of the claimant’s colleagues”

HowdenCompetitive, comprehensive, quick

One of the largest independent specialist motor trade brokers in the UK. Our extensive history of supplying insurance to the motor trade means we understand your business needs. By partnering with a specialist insurance broker like us, you get exactly what you need to protect your business.

As such, his belief in opposing critical race theory amounts to a protected characteristic that can be afforded protection by Section 10 of the Equality Act.

The criteria for whether a philosophical belief is likely to have protection arises from the case of Grainger plc and they are as follows:-

  • The belief must be genuinely held
  • It must be a belief not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available
  • It must relate to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour
  • It must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance
  • It must be worthy of respect in democratic society and not incompatible with human dignity or the fundamental rights of others
  • It must have a similar status or cogency to a religious belief
  • It need not be shared by others
  • It may be a political philosophy or doctrine
  • It may be based on science

Below are some examples of philosophical beliefs employment tribunals have upheld as being worthy of protection in recent years, followed by a list of those that have not. 

  • Environmentalism and belief in climate change
  • Anti fox hunting belief
  • A belief in the “higher purpose” of public service broadcasting
  • A belief in Scottish Independence
  • A belief in public service for the common good
  • A belief that lying is always wrong
  • Democratic socialist beliefs
  • A belief in a participatory democracy
  • A belief mediums can communicate with the dead
  • Ethical veganism

Those beliefs found not to be worthy of protection include:

  • Belief that 9/11 and 7/7 were “false flag” operations
  • Belief that poppies should be worn in early November
  • Membership of the BNP
  • Marxist/Trotskyist beliefs
  • Belief that Jews are God’s chosen people
  • Belief that homosexuality is contrary to God’s law
  • Vegetarianism
  • Belief that the holocaust did not happen

The advice to employers is to proceed with caution if an employee cites a philosophical belief as a reason for doing something and to give the situation some serious thought and seek advice if you need to. 

Polly DaviesLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

It’s not just women’s problems

Women and Equalities Committee open inquiry into existing discrimination legislation and workplace practices around the menopause.

Gender critical beliefs are protected

Employees must learn to live with the diversity of opinions in our society unless they are expressed in an objectively offensive and disruptive way.

Equal pay for equal work

Jeremy Vine was paid almost seven times more than Samira Ahmed for what the Tribunal concluded were ‘minor differences’ in their work.

Ethical Veganism

Under the Equality Act 2010, religion or belief are protected characteristics.

Men behaving badly

Sexual harassment in the workplace is prohibited conduct amounting to discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Equal pay

Men and Women in the workplace must receive equal treatment.

Definition of disability: vision impairment

The Equality Act 2010 makes no qualification that the cost of correction is to be taken into consideration.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.