Does your customer know who they are dealing with?


Comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006

Author: Nona Bowkis
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 5 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

If you have set your business up as a Limited Company, doubtless you will know that one of the advantages is not being personally liable for financial losses if things go horribly wrong (unless there is an element of fraud).

However, this protection could be lost if you have not made it clear to the consumer that you are a Limited Company. This can happen when a trading name is used but the trader fails to comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 to include the company’s official details on their website and invoices.  

By way of example, one of our dealers was taken to court re an allegedly defective vehicle. The sale had taken place a week before the dealer closed his previous Limited Company and started a new one. The trading name was not changed.  

Our first line of defence was that the consumer bought from the previous Limited Company which was now dissolved and so there was no liability. However, the judge was not convinced as the sales invoice only had the trading name and no details at all of the Limited Company. It should have said that xxx is a trading name of xxx Limited and it should have listed its registered number, its registered address and stated it was registered in England. This information should have been on the website and all stationary.

Without that information, the judge decided liability fell to the trading name and so our dealer had no defence on that argument. Fortunately, we had a second and third line of defence but without those, the dealer would have become liable for the entire claim and so do ensure that if you want the protection of being a Limited Company, you don’t lose it by not making it clear to your customer, exactly with whom they are dealing.

Nona Bowkis

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.