Cheques – As good as cash

legal updates

If you end up with a cheque which is bounced, the next step is to put the drawer on notice of the dishonoured cheque.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Have you ever had a customer paying by cheque? Bit of a nuisance, are they not – the cheques, not the customers.

Not all is as bad as it seems though. In a recent court case, a garage equipped with our advice had a successful debut in court as a litigant in person against a customer who paid for repair by cheque and stopped the cheque before money left his account.

A cheque is a negotiable instrument, it is an unconditional promise to pay. The person who issued a cheque, called a drawer, can be sued if this promise is broken. If a cheque is bounced back for any reason: insufficient funds, the cheque is stopped by the drawer, a claim can be issued against the drawer for the cheque amount.

There is virtually no defence in claims based on cheques. In very rare circumstances the drawer may argue nothing of value was received for the cheque issued, for example, goods were ordered and paid by a cheque but never received. Arguments over quality of goods or services, or their correspondence to the description cannot raise any successful defence. In this respect cheques are favourable different from card payments as chargebacks do not apply to cheque payments.

If you end up with a cheque which is bounced, the next step is to put the drawer on notice of the dishonoured cheque. This will not be required if the cheque was stopped, in legal terms the payment was countermanded.


Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

Kiril MoskovchukTrainee SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Unlawful attempt to wind up car dealer’s company thwarted

The expression “petition” in the legal sense is where (usually) the creditor makes an application to the court.

Help! I am being chased for interest and compensation against invoices I paid years ago

We would advise you to check your contracts with suppliers for the payment terms and what happens in the event of late payment.

Chasing a debt

You now have to give the person 30 days to respond and either make payment or send back the reply form and information sheet.

Does the Government owe YOU?

UK small and medium sized businesses owed £26.3 billion in late payments.

Statutory interest and compensation in business to business transactions

The compensation starts at £40 for commercial debts of less than £1,000 and escalates to £100 for commercial debts of £10,000 or more.

New rules for those chasing bad debts

If you are chasing a debt from 1 October 2017, you need to be aware of and follow the new rules.

Abuse of process – inappropriate use of the threat of insolvency

The Solicitors acting for the Creditor should have known better than to use the threat of insolvency for debt collection purposes,

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.