Author: Roxanne Bradley
Published: March 10, 2019
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 3 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
Service and repair garages can sometimes be faced with undertaking repair work to a vehicle and finding the consumer has no money to pay for the work undertaken.
In certain circumstances the garage can withhold the release of the vehicle, if payment for that repair is not made (this is called exercising a lien).
There are restrictions to bear in mind, being the following:
- a repair or improvement must have been undertaken to the vehicle. Investigating a fault/diagnostics or storage charges wouldn’t apply
- there has to be a continuation of possession, so if initial work is undertaken, the vehicle is released to the consumer and then further work is undertaken, then a new lien from the initial work cannot be imposed.
However, if the vehicle is not owned by the consumer and is subject to a lease agreement/hire purchase agreement then its more complex. This is because the finance company could attempt to exclude the creation of the lien by a term within the agreement. Attempts could be made to argue the clause if the clause has not been brought to the repairing garage when being instructed by the consumer who is in control of the vehicle.
A notice in the reception area which puts the consumer upon notice also would not hurt.