Lawgistics successfully remove defamatory postings


The posts however must be false, malicious, and now under the Defamation Act 2013, must have the potential to cause serious harm to the reputation of the business.

Author: Dennis Chapman
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 8 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We have had a recent spate of clients have issues with consumers posting reviews, forum blogs or websites that defame their company name.

Having made contact with the individuals in question and the organisation that hosts the website where the posts have been made, we were able to successfully have the offending posts removed.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952, states the following:

“Slander affecting official, professional or business reputation.
In an action for slander in respect of words calculated to disparage the plaintiff in any office, profession, calling, trade or business held or carried on by him at the time of the publication, it shall not be necessary to allege or prove special damage, whether or not the words are spoken of the plaintiff in the way of his office, profession, calling, trade or business.”

As such any posting that could have the effect of altering the reputation of your business in the mind of the average consumer you can make a case to have the content removed. The posts however must be false, malicious, and now under the Defamation Act 2013, must have the potential to cause serious harm to the reputation of the business. As such, if the matter was to be taken to court, Claimants will now have to show that they gave suffered financial loss as a direct result of the posting. More often than not these cases will be settled before it comes to this form of action.

We are finding that postings of this nature are arising due to the fact that customers feel they are being ignored and their complaints not listened to, or dealt with effectively. Whilst we have been successful in defending such actions, this should not be a fallback position for clients to rely upon and all efforts should be made to deal with customer complaints quickly and effectively.

Dennis Chapman

In remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.