Lawgistics successfully remove defamatory postings

legal updates

The posts however must be false, malicious, and now under the Defamation Act 2013, must have the potential to cause serious harm to the reputation of the business.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We have had a recent spate of clients have issues with consumers posting reviews, forum blogs or websites that defame their company name.

Having made contact with the individuals in question and the organisation that hosts the website where the posts have been made, we were able to successfully have the offending posts removed.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952, states the following:

“Slander affecting official, professional or business reputation.
In an action for slander in respect of words calculated to disparage the plaintiff in any office, profession, calling, trade or business held or carried on by him at the time of the publication, it shall not be necessary to allege or prove special damage, whether or not the words are spoken of the plaintiff in the way of his office, profession, calling, trade or business.”

As such any posting that could have the effect of altering the reputation of your business in the mind of the average consumer you can make a case to have the content removed. The posts however must be false, malicious, and now under the Defamation Act 2013, must have the potential to cause serious harm to the reputation of the business. As such, if the matter was to be taken to court, Claimants will now have to show that they gave suffered financial loss as a direct result of the posting. More often than not these cases will be settled before it comes to this form of action.

We are finding that postings of this nature are arising due to the fact that customers feel they are being ignored and their complaints not listened to, or dealt with effectively. Whilst we have been successful in defending such actions, this should not be a fallback position for clients to rely upon and all efforts should be made to deal with customer complaints quickly and effectively.

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Disclaimers – are these really worth the paper they are written on?

Of course, if someone ignores all valid warnings and suffers injury, then they may only have themselves to blame.

The court finds car dealer partly liable for damage caused by the removal of a sticker!

Due to COVID-19, the court held an Early Neutral Evaluation, a 30-minute telephone assessment of each party’s position.

Defamation – How suing for libel and slander is easier said than done!

All well and good for the rich and famous or organisations with cavernously deep pockets but for mere mortals, that is rarely the answer.

Awarded £25,000 in general damages and Trustpilot ordered to remove review

Perhaps the wide reporting of this case will give malicious reviewers pause for thought.

Dealing with negative online reviews

You should deal with the situation as it is and, offer a solution if there is one.

Misrepresentation? Not without an untrue statement

On the evidence, there was no question that our member had complied with his obligations under the Consumer Rights Act, fully.

Afterparty? One after party with work colleagues leads to a pay out…

An argument broke out regarding a new employee’s placement and terms.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.