Author: Dennis Chapman
Published: March 5, 2013
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 9 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
In light of the recent Vicky Pryce Trail, whereby Mr Justice Sweeney felt it appropriate to disband the jury on the basis of incompetence, we ask, what does this mean for the future of a Jury?
The Jury were unable to reach a decision after 13 hours deliberation over a fairly simple legal issue, who then felt the need to ask further questions of the judge some of which showed a failure to understand basic information that was presented to them during the trial.
The matter has come to light as this was a high profile case, however it is worrisome that issues like these may have been dormant in juries for some time.
Is this a call to re-evaluate the current Jury system?
Should tests be put in place to test for Jury competency?
Such questions are now being asked, hopefully with some result. Juries deal with cases which can decide the outcome of someone’s entire life, and as such reform is now necessary in light of the above case.
Let us know your thoughts on our Twitter page @Lawgistics_UK. Do you feel safe that if you are in a court room the 12 persons sat before you will make a fair, concise and well thought out decision?