County Court system benefits from errors made by its staff


Another example of blatant extortion by the court system.

Author: Jason Williams
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 4 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The writer is increasingly fed up of how the County Court service seemingly seeks to maximise its own income even when it is the one who has made an error.

For example, a client puts on the Directions Questionnaire the dates that they would not be available to attend a court hearing.  The court (presumably in error)  goes ahead and arranges a hearing on a date that has been declared unavailable by one of the parties.  Now you would think that a common sense approach would be to email the court and point out its own error and ask them to re-arrange the date?  No.  The response was “If you want to change the date, you must make a formal application and pay the fee of £100”.  

As it happened, our client made the application but did not pay the fee on the basis that it ought not to have been paid in order to correct a mistake by the court.  So, the court threw out the application, refused to adjourn the hearing and no doubt will find in favour of the person who was able to turn up.

Another example of blatant extortion by the court system is where a party pays £255 for a hearing to set aside a judgment given in default but where that party immediately agrees with the opponent that it be set aside without a hearing.  The court demands £100 to “rubber stamp” the Consent Order drafted by the parties but refuses to return the £255 for a hearing it never had to arrange let alone administer.

No wonder there were reports in the Summer that HMCTS – who run the County Court service – has racked up a nice little “surplus” of over £100,000,000  (yes that is one hundred million pounds).  

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.