The real difference between claims under and over £10k

legal updates

Litigation isn’t always just about having a strong argument, there are many factors that can help you win a case and reduce your risk.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Whilst the mathematical difference between claims under and over £10k may only be a couple of hundred pounds, in litigation terms, it could mean a difference of £20k or more.

This is all down to how the court allocates the case. If your customers claim for any amount up to £10k, the court will almost certainly allocate the matter to the Small Claims Track. In the small claims track, unless one of the parties has behaved particularly unreasonably, the losing party won’t have to pay the winning party’s legal costs (just the court fees).

However, a similar case with a slightly higher value of £10k plus will find its way into the court’s Fast Track. More complicated cases and those with a value over £25k will go into the court’s Multi-Track. Both fast track and multi-track claims generally lead to the loser paying the winner’s legal costs. In some recent fast track cases, we have seen costs of between £20k and £30k. These figures can be argued down but ultimately, once the value of a case goes over £10k, if you are on the losing side, the risk escalates regarding how much your final bill may be. If a case goes into the multi-track, the costs can be eye-watering.

Parties often do not realise the potential cost consequences of being on the losing side. Given this risk, if at all possible, it is worth thinking about bringing the value of a claim down. As a recent example, there was a dispute over an £80k motorhome purchased by one of our clients. A refund was agreed but the parties could not reach an agreement on the cost of some ancillary matters. So, instead of issuing a refund for the entire £80k, we negotiated a partial settlement, leaving less than £10k to argue over. As the court claim was now less than £10k, it went into the small claims track and reduced the cost risk from a possible £30k to nothing.  

Litigation isn’t always just about having a strong argument, there are many factors that can help you win a case and reduce your risk. Our legal team is well versed in assisting clients through the court process, so if you are in the motor trade, you know where to come.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Your Evidence Is Vital

As opposing witnesses give different accounts of what has happened, some cases really will hinge on which version of events the judge prefers.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Finance Company Unhappy with Court Ruling

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars.

Disclose or not to disclose, that is the question

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

Detailed records avoid post-sale issues

The Claimant was only entitled to compensation for the cost of repairs to the locks, which were considered likely to have been faulty at the point of sale and was awarded £385.

Claimant failed to satisfy the burden of proof

No real evidence to suggest the extant problems with his vehicle were in any way related to the repairs that had been undertaken

Metadata matters! Proving dates of evidence

Metadata means “data about data” and is defined as “the data providing information about one or more aspects of the data in question.”

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.