Cessation of MOT licence averted

legal updates

The VEM’s findings amounted to a breach of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles (Tests) Regulations 1981 (as amended) and disciplinary action was commenced.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So was the outcome of a recent case where we were tasked to advise and make representations on behalf of a vehicle test station (VTS) member to the DVSA, following a routine site review (RSR) at about the end of the last national lockdown.

The RSR, at a “green site”, had previously been delayed due to COVID-19 but on inspection, the vehicle examiner (VEM) found that major testing equipment had not been properly calibrated/recalibrated, as required or at all.

The VEM’s findings amounted to a breach of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles (Tests) Regulations 1981 (as amended) and disciplinary action was commenced against the VTS under the disciplinary section of the MOT Testing Guide (MOTTG) with the immediate issue of 500 disciplinary points, being the maximum penalty permitted, which if upheld would in turn lead to the cessation of MOT licence for a period of five (5) years, reputational damage, and loss of revenue of up to £500,000 for the VTS in question. Understandably, our member was suitably concerned and immediately sought our expert advice and assistance.

Working in close concert with our member, we made suitable representations to the DVSA at length and in short order. This included a detailed timeline and review of all relevant processes. Indeed, our member had taken immediate and far ranging voluntary action at the RSR to remedy the breach, which included comprehensive reviews of all group VTS.

As a result of such review(s), it was found that the VTS in question was the only site in group with any anomalies and all shortcomings had been remedied and approved by the VEM, forthwith. There was no evidence of any dishonesty on the part of the VTS and it appeared to be a wholly uncharacteristic oversight, which had been caused or contributed to by issues created through the global pandemic, all of which assisted in mitigation.

Our careful and considered representations managed to persuade the DVSA to find that immediate cessation of licence against the VTS would be “unduly harsh” and the disciplinary points were reduced to 100, together with a formal and final warning, which on the facts was the best our member could have hoped to achieve. Indeed, our member was rightly delighted and relieved in equal measure.

Cessation of MOT licence averted – mission accomplished!

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Advertising a car with no MOT?  Not a defence if the car is unroadworthy

If you do sell an unroadworthy vehicle that kills someone, you might be looking at a manslaughter charge too…

A New MOT is Not Absolute Defence to “Unroadworthy” Prosecutions

Clients ought to avoid relying entirely on a MOT pass and should undertake a comprehensive and honest pre-delivery inspection.

MOT Testers and Authorised Examiners – please be vigilant

We ask all testers and their supervisors to remember that you have to be accountable for every action or inaction.

Judge gives short shrift to Porsche claim

Sold without warranty, with a current MOT and after a thorough pre-delivery inspection (PDI), which revealed no faults.

COVID-19: MOT, maintenance and service centres remain open for business, despite the lockdown

A valid MOT, extended or not, is no guarantee that a vehicle remains roadworthy for the duration.

COVID-19: MOT Centres and Garages can stay open …but for how long?

For those selling cars, many of our dealers have been following our advice and have moved to distance sales.

This Morris is major not minor

Through various means, plus an amazing stroke of luck, I managed to reacquire the family Morris Minor

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.