Being sued as an individual – do the courts know the rules?

legal_updates

One court wrote back saying “case to remain in this court as the Defendant is a trader”.

Author: Jason Williams
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 3 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The Civil Procedure Rules (CPRs) state where (geographically) the case will be heard.  This can be important where car dealer and the consumer are at opposite ends of the country.

Apart from a few exceptions, the general rule is that the case will be heard in the county court closest to the Claimant.  However, it is held in the nearest county court to the Defendant if that Defendant is an INDIVIDUAL*.  

We see all too often, cases being allocated to the Claimant’s local court all of the time, even though this rule is pointed out when the car dealer Defendant asks us to complete their Directions Questionnaire.  Where this happens we write a letter for our client for them to send to the court asking that it be transferred  to their local court.  It works – but not always first time.  One court wrote back saying “case to remain in this court as the Defendant is a trader”.  So another letter was drafted making it clear that the test is not whether the Defendant is a “trader” but whether he or she is an “individual”.  In this case, our client was a sole trader and was clearly an individual.  Eventually, two weeks before the hearing and another judge transfers the case to the court local to our client – a saving of a 400 mile round trip!

But guess what?  I pick up another file and the same court has done it again!  Time to draft another letter and maybe, just maybe, they will realise the error of their ways this time but I won’t be holding my breath…

Lawgistics Members can get advice and support in relation to Court procedures from the legal team.

*Civil Procedure Rule 26.2A (3)

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.