Trading Standards Interviews


We find that Trading Standards Officers don’t always know their stuff as well as we do!

Author: Jason Williams
Reading time: 3 minutes

This article is 3 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Members who are being “investigated” by Trading Standards are often invited in to have a formal interview under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). 

It is important that you contact us at this early stage.  The longer you leave it, the less influence we can have on how things will end up.  For if you “go it alone” and receive a huge file of charges that you have to answer to in the Magistrates’ Court, the amount of assistance we can give is quite minimal.  Not only will the timescale be very short – usually a week or two before having to go to court leaving us with very little time to consider the merits of the charges – the file will no longer be under control of Trading Standards but with the council’s legal department, who rarely wish to discuss the case in advance of the court case.  Usually, a client will need to incur the significant expense of having a solicitor attend and either contest the charges or mitigate a guilty plea.

However, we find that Trading Standards Officers don’t always know their stuff as well as we do!  For example, one of our clients was stranded in another country having suffered a bad accident.  He was unable to attend a request to attend a PACE interview in person and so we asked Trading Standards to send the questions to us by e-mail so that our client could respond to them by the same method.  

We were astounded to be told that this was not possible because the answers have to be given “under oath”.  This is an example of utter incompetence.  For whilst Trading Standards need to give their “you do not have to say anything… “ caution, it was complete nonsense to assert that the answers needed to be given under oath.  We were also bemused to be told subsequently that the council would be continuing their investigation without any questions being asked – only for the client to then be asked to attend again!  

So we wrote to the Chief Executive of the Council pointing out his colleagues’ ineptitude and inconsistencies.  The result?  PACE questions will now be sent to our client by e-mail.

What this now does is let Trading Standards know that we are watching them.  Any toe that crosses the procedural line and we’ll be treading on it very hard indeed!

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.