Porridge for car “clockers”

legal_updates

As well as charges for reducing mileages, charges were also proven for conspiracy to defraud and money laundering offences.

Author: Jason Williams
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 6 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

If time were as easy to turn back as the odometers of cars then one wonders whether Erk Dymiter and Krystian Skowronski would have opted to indulge in the car trade as they did.

Following a very long investigation by Trading Standards they were each given 18 month prison sentences. As well as charges for reducing mileages, charges were also proven for conspiracy to defraud and money laundering offences.

We understand that the two used false names and telephone numbers to hide their identities, that cars had been sold with false MOTs and service histories and in some cases, the mileages had been reduced by as much as 100,000 miles.

It is individuals like these who sadly give the entire motor industry an undeserved bad name and are the stories that always hit the headlines.  Regrettably, you will never see a headline saying “Car dealer repairs vehicle despite being under no legal obligation” or “Dodgy consumer tries to cheat car dealer” – although each are far more prevalent.

And whilst we congratulate Trading Standards for their efforts here, it is surprising that there was no reporting of any Order given by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act. This allows enforcement agencies to recover the ill-gotten financial gains obtained through crime. The press release I read stated that the two of them are “believed to have pocketed thousands of pounds” – which suggests that they may well be re-united with it all once they are out of prison…

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.