Author: Jason Williams
Published: June 6, 2014
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 7 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
We are currently assisting one of our clients in a dispute involving £4,000.
The customer lives in Town A and our Client is a small business based in Town B, some 180 miles away. The case was scheduled for 10am one day in July in a County Court that is in Town A, just 1 mile from where their customer lives.
We wrote to the court asking for the hearing to be moved to a court in Town C, approximately mid-way between the two parties. The court said “no”, it was to stay where it was and that if our client couldn’t make it they could ask for their case to be decided on their written statements only.
We appealed, arguing that the Judge in the first instance had not taken any or sufficient consideration of a requirement of the Civil Procedure Rules. A Rule which states that the Court must take into account the financial value of the dispute and “whether it would be more convenient or fair for hearings (including the trial) to be held in some other court”.
As a consequence, the decision has now been over-turned and is now to be heard at a court based in Town C.