Happy Birthday Motor Ombudsman

legal updates

It would certainly appear they are the consumers’ champion.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We congratulate The Motor Ombudsman on their first birthday and are pleased to read the positive news informing us they have received 40,500 contacts from consumers and raised 1900 cases during their first year. It would certainly appear they are the consumers’ champion.

However, to draw any sensible conclusion we would need a little more detail.

We note they say ‘40,500 contacts’, which would suggest that normal day to day businesses calls such as someone simply calling to inform them of an error on their website could be included within this figure. The Motor Trade really needs to know how many calls were taken relating to the Motor Ombudsman’s accredited garages, what the nature of the calls and outcomes were.

The same goes for the 1900 cases. It would appear that less than 5% of the contacts received turn into cases. We assume ‘cases’ means they resort to taking the ADR route. For the Motor Trade to understand if this is positive news we need to know how many of these cases were resolved at the ADR level and how many ended up in court. How many went in the favour of the consumer and how many went in the favour of the garage.

We can understand consumers need to have faith in The Motor Ombudsman and the initial published figures certainly suggest that they may well do. However, the Motor Trade also needs to have faith in The Motor Ombudsman. After all you are the hand that feeds them and without the support of the accredited garages The Motor Ombudsman would not exist. Therefore, it is essential that they are transparent with the figures and help us evaluate the value of their work.

The Motor Ombudsman claims that 99% of all new cars sold in the UK are covered by their code. Again, we would like to see proof and not just headline grabbing figures. Also, what about used cars?

We note the Chartered Trading Standards Institute have removed The Motor Ombudsman’s original count of 7500 subscribing businesses to their CTSI Consumer Codes Approval Scheme from their website, as it was believed to be incorrect. We now worry that as consumers are getting onboard with the concept of a Motor Ombudsman the Motor Trade is taking a different view. 

The Motor Ombudsman claims to have 1000’s of accredited garages. However, their own garage finder only lists 2000, far fewer than they originally claimed. We have asked them on numerous occasions to confirm the official number of businesses currently subscribing to their code but sadly they are yet to respond.

It would be great to hear that the number of accredited garages have gone up and that they are receiving the same level of support from the Motor Trade as they are from the consumer and that their work is having a positive influence on your business. Then we too could celebrate their first-year of trading under their new name.

If you are or were an accredited garage and want to share your experience of The Motor Ombudsman, good or bad, we would love to hear from you.

WeRecruit Auto LtdPermanent Automotive Recruitment from an experienced and trustworthy recruitment partner.

We cover roles within all departments and sectors of the Automotive industry, and are here to listen to your specific needs and find the most suitable candidates to fit your business.

Joel CombesManaging DirectorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

The Motor Ombudsman

A woeful lack of knowledge of basic consumer and trading standards law.

A faux pas by the Motor Ombudsman?

The dealer is £850 down and the consumer a straight £850 up!

The Motor Ombudsman confirm they CANNOT provide specific legal advice to Motor Traders

This creates a situation that will put the dealer on the back foot and leave them acting alone.

Exploding the myths of ADR

Will the Motor Trader receive the same service from the The Motor Ombudsman, which it enjoyed through Motorcodes?

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.