Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
The Court of Appeal recently agreed with the initial court to award a compensatory sum of £7500 to be paid by a bank to a customer where it had attempted to make a number of calls to a customer in relation to their accounts.
So – how many and over what period?
547 attempted calls over a 6 month period!
Additionally it showed that the customer was well within their rights not to talk to the bank, which ought then to have instigated formal legal proceedings for debt recovery rather than bombard their client further.
The action was brought under the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.