The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

legal updates

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Sometimes all you need is a little nudge in the right direction to begin to unravel a complaint or issue raised with a vehicle you have sold or a repair you have undertaken.

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning of any issues raised to avoid any prolonged correspondence or even a lengthy court case.

Let’s begin with inspections – Who should do what and when?

Within the first 30 days after purchase, the consumer must provide evidence that the vehicle is faulty and that the fault raised was present or developing at the time of sale. You should request evidence from the consumer when they raise a complaint within this time.

Between 30 days and six months, the law presumes that the issue was present at the time of sale, and it is up to the trader to rebut that presumption. This may be as simple as referring to the PDI or MOT for items specifically tested or checked during these inspections. However, most of the time, the trader should inspect the vehicle to ascertain how the issue has come about.

From six months post-purchase and onwards, the burden is back on the consumer to prove that the vehicle is faulty and that the fault raised was present or developing at the time of sale.

What should a trader do if the consumer has had repairs carried out and wants reimbursement?

Whilst the correct process is to follow the above guidance concerning evidence, a consumer may decide to have the vehicle inspected and repairs conducted before contacting the trader.

If the consumer has sufficient evidence that would confirm the trader to have been liable to undertake the repairs, the consumer has an argument to request reimbursement from the trader. Of course, this can only be decided on the strength of the case presented by the consumer.

Consumers may choose to have work undertaken at a main dealer, with brand new parts, or at a specialist, and the repair invoice may be inflated in cost. The trader should consider what the repairs would have cost them had they been given the opportunity to repair the vehicle.

Cable For My CarWe offer free next day delivery* on all EV charging cables when shipped within mainland UK

Stocking only premium EV charging cables, we ensure you experience a stress-free EV charge, over and over, confidently backed by our 2 year warranty. Our premium & reliable charging cables are compliant with EU & UK safety standards. We offer free next day delivery* on all EV charging cables when shipped within mainland UK.

A trader has sold a vehicle under distance sale, with paperwork provided, and there is an issue – What should the trader do?

First, the trader should refer to their own terms and conditions that were provided to the consumer prior to the vehicle purchase. The terms should contain details as to who bears the cost of returning the vehicle if either party cancels the contract under distance selling rules. If there is not a term confirming this, then the trader will need to bear any costs of getting the vehicle back.

Remember, in the distant selling 14-day cooling-off period, a consumer can cancel the contract for any reason – there does not need to be a fault, unlike the Consumer Rights Act (CRA) 2015.

If the consumer is claiming issues under the CRA 2015, the trader should consider having the vehicle inspected locally to where the consumer is based to save the time and cost of having the vehicle returned for inspection. Traders can instruct independent experts to complete Civil Procedures Rules (CPR) Part 35 compliant reports at a cost, and an expert will inspect the vehicle where it is located. Of course, the trader should bear in mind that if any in-depth inspection of the vehicle, such as inspecting engine internals or removing a gearbox is required, this cannot be completed on a consumer’s driveway and the vehicle must be moved to a workshop to ensure a complete and accurate inspection.

If an issue is discovered and there is evidence to support that the trader is liable to assist, the CRA 2015 confirms the trader must bear the costs of getting the vehicle returned if a rejection is due or if the trader is to conduct a repair.

If you are unsure about when distance selling rules apply, get in touch with Lawgistics before continuing with any delivery purchases. If the rules do apply, and the required paperwork was not provided to the consumer, they have up to one year and 14 days to reject the vehicle for a full refund – and for any reason.

Lawgistics’ legal helpline remains available for our members to call in about queries and/or further guidance on what to do.

Kimberly StickleySolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

The omni-channel approach and distance sales

The conclusion of a contract when purchasing a vehicle occurs when a deposit or the full purchase price is paid.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.