Author: Dennis Chapman
Published: April 2, 2012
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 10 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
Recent appeal cases (Vasant Pattni v First Leicester Buses Ltd/Darren Bent v Highways and Utilities Construction Ltd and Allianz Insurance) have put sensible limits on what credit hire companies can charge when an ‘innocent’ driver takes out a loan car to cover the period his or her car is off the road waiting for repair.
Hire companies have sought to charge credit on high short terms hire charges and interest on the charges payable from the time the car comes off hire until the date of judgement in Court.
In these cases the questions under condition boiled down to:-
a) Whether a particular hire car was necessary at a particular rate
b) Did the driver have means to pay for hire charges him/herself
The outcome was that the Court considered if someone had the means to pay the hire charges then the claim should be limited to a ‘sensible’ period rate for the hire and interest should not be chargeable after the hire period has finished.