Claiming legal costs in Small Claims hearings


The judge ruled that the claimant’s evidence was “shoddy in the extreme”, dismissing his claim.

Author: Jason Williams
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 3 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In Small Claims court cases (usually under £10,000) the general principle is that each party bears their own legal costs. 

In other words, if you chose to appoint a solicitor and win, you still have to pay for his or her time.  Unlike cases that are over the Small Claims threshold, where the loser pays the winners’ legal costs.  This is to discourage the risk of disproportionate legal costs for “small” disputes.  Not that £10000 is a “small” amount for most of us!

However, the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) state that costs can be awarded against a party in a small claims hearing where the other party has demonstrated unreasonable conduct.  That includes (but is not limited to) declining an offer to settle – CPR 27.14(2)(g) and (3).

We recently had such a case where our client asked for their legal representatives’ attendance costs to be met by an “unreasonable” litigant in person.  One who (amongst other things) was faced with an expert witness report that made it clear that any issues now with the car were nothing more than to be expected and one who refused to accept the subsequent offer to drop the case in return for our client agreeing to pay for that report in full and to waive any expenses that they would seek if they attended court.

The judge ruled that the claimant’s evidence was “shoddy in the extreme”, dismissing his claim. And upon reading the settlement offers that were declined, ordered that the defendant pay all the expert witness fees as well as the cost of the advocate attending court.  Some litigants in person think that the “no costs” rule allows them to bring the most “ambitious” of cases and can treat the court and their opponents with contempt.  This shows that it not wise so to do.

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.