Are some Motor Factors overlooking Distance Selling laws?

legal updates

If a consumer pays a motor factor for parts it is sufficient for it to be a distance sale.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We are seeing it more and more these days.  Online “Motor Factors” is an arrangement whereby a consumer can select a component or part online that they want fitted.

Upon order and payment of component or part – the consumer takes their vehicle to a garage, which has that part waiting for them (sent by the part-seller) and whereupon it is fitted.  The consumer pays the garage separately for the labour of fitting.

Where a consumer purchases a part online – unless it is bespoke (maybe where a new number plate is ordered) – it is likely to be considered a distance sale, even if that part is not sent directly to the consumer but to the fitting garage instead.

All of the elements are likely to be present for it to be a distance sale – no face to face contact before the part is ordered and paid for and the delivery service being offered to consumers as part of a regular online selling scheme.  A cancellation notice ought to be sent to the consumer directly giving 14 days to cancel.

The fact that the consumer pays the part-seller for it, is sufficient for it to be a distance sale.  Having it sent to another garage to be fitted does not exclude it from distance selling.  That is, after all, nothing more than a matter of mutual convenience – a bit like having the part delivered to a consumer’s place of work.

And so we have one contract for the sale of the part and a separate contract of services with the garage who are to fit that part.  

If the retailer that sold the part and the consumer paid them for it, then it will almost certainly be covered by distance selling BUT the alternative is even more of a nuisance. 

For if the garage that was to fit it, paid the parts-supplier themselves. And if the consumer then paid that garage for the service of fitting, then there would be no need to provide a cancellation notice.  This is because the buyer is now a trade-buyer and not a consumer.  And when the consumer pays the garage for the part and the fitting of it he will do so by attendance at the garage and thus it would not be a distance sale.

HOWEVER, the problem with that is that the fitting garage then bears all responsibility if the part supplied fails.  And this could be really expensive and a right pain for that garage. 

We have had cases where the consumers have complained to the fitting garage about the failure of the part – but as we pointed out – the consumer paid for that part and is (in legal terms) giving it to someone else to insert it into their car.  The part was fitted perfectly – the part was just duff!  In this case it is for the consumer to sort out not the fitting garage.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

But in answer to the question posed in the heading: Motor Factors – are they overlooking Distance Selling laws? The answer we would say (on the balance of probabilities!) is “yes”!  Of course only the courts – and NOT Trading Standards – can give a definitive answer…

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Cost of living increase

With the increase in cost for just about everything, we anticipate that consumers will be feeling the squeeze and therefore, will either seek to reject vehicles or request for repairs to be undertaken.

Distance Selling Cancellation and Rejection – A Basic Legal Lesson for Finance Companies

The finance company who buy the car, are not consumers. The regulations do not apply to buyers, who purchase “in the course of trade or business.

Ambush! – Application to revisit determined arguments and introduce new claims refused

The judge merely allowed for fixed costs in accordance with the Small Claims Track cost regime

Opportunistic and misconceived claim for psychological harm struck out at a preliminary hearing

Consumer seeking to throw everything and the kitchen sink at our member in the vain hope that something might just stick

Online sales tax (OST)

With different interpretations of distance sales being bandied about, it is hard to see if and how OST will ever get implemented.

Why did you replace that? That must prove it was faulty!

The customer rejected the vehicle under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA) on the basis that it was within 30 days of purchase and the vehicle was not of satisfactory quality or fit for purpose.

Divorcing couples and their cars

The vast majority of cases are not theft. They are civil disputes and for this reason we would initially recommend speaking to a solicitor or Citizens Advice.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.