135 pages may be excessive but 0 pages is worthless

legal_updates

Don't fall into a lawyer's trap of saying something in a paragraph that could just as easily have been written in a sentence?

Author: Jason Williams
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 8 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In a previous legal update we mentioned how we were assisting one of our clients who had been given Congestion Charge fines on a vehicle that they had given to a customer on a ‘courtesy’ basis whilst their own was being repaired.

The Appeal against those fines is being considered by an independent panel in August and it’s not for me to pass any more comment on the detail of the case until after the event.  However, it is usual in such matters for opposing parties to have to give their evidence to each other in advance.  Lawgistics submitted 5 pages of legal submissions as evidence in two stages.  Transport for London sent us 135 pages.  As the appeal is based on 2 points of law only it reminded me of that often used clich ‘less is more’.  And that sometimes when I review letters I’ve drafted for clients I have to ask myself whether I too have fallen into the lawyer’s trap of saying something in a paragraph that could just as easily have been written in a sentence?

But the real problem is when a business receives letters of complaint but does nothing about them or waits too long before replying.  For when that customer then goes to court the fact of the matter is that no matter how poor their case is against you, not responding to complaints will be treated by the court as a very serious failing on your part.  It could actually be the difference between winning and losing a case.

And so if you cannot reply quickly at least send a holding acknowledgement letter before setting aside time to formulate a response (or forwarding it onto us).  Put simply, when you receive a customer complaint, doing nothing should simply not be an option.

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.