You cannot have your cake and afford it

legal_updates

This update is not about the rights and wrongs of it all. Simply to remind everyone just how expensive and risky going to court can be.

Author: Jason Williams
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 3 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

You may well have read about the recent case in Northern Ireland where a bakery refused to produce a cake with a message that they did not agree was appropriate. 

This update is not about the rights and wrongs of it all.  Simply to remind everyone just how expensive and risky going to court can be.

The District Judge in the first instance found against the bakery and ordered that they pay damages (compensation) of £500.  The bakery appealed and lost again and so appealed to the highest court in the UK.  And by the time the case was decided by the Supreme Court the legal bill to the “loser” – was in the region of £450,000!  To put it into perspective, the cost of the cake – had it been baked – was just £36.50.

Oh, and the case ran for over four years…..

And the point is that sometimes in life we have to make decisions based on actual economics and not just because something is “unfair” or “wrong”.  What the writer finds unfair is that the individual* who brought the case in the first instance and who had two courts agree with him, now has to meet all the accumulated legal costs, just because the third court decided otherwise.  What it means ultimately, is, that the lower courts that made the “wrong” decisions get to carry on with doing more of the same, whilst those who initially succeeded have to now pay for those “bad” rulings.

We often get clients who want to fight every dispute and appeal every court decision that goes against them.  But it can get expensive, time consuming and ultimately not always worth the time spent – regardless of what the court finally determines.  Principles come at a considerable price.

*The individual was supported by the Equality Commission who will pay the legal costs of both parties.

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.