Working Time Regulations: rest breaks


He was told by his management instead that he should work 8 hours without a break and leave early.

Author: Kiril Moskovchuk
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 5 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In a recent case, Grange v Abellio London the Employment Appeal Tribunal put the onus onto the employer to ensure the rest breaks are arranged and taken in compliance with the Working Time Regulations.

In this case, the employee was contracted to work an 8.5 hour shift, which included a half an hour break for lunch. He was told by his management instead that he should work 8 hours without a break and leave early.

The employee subsequently issued a claim based on Section 10 of the Working Time Regulations that he was refused a rest break. The employer raised in their defence that the employee had never asked for a rest break and therefore had not been refused his statutory entitlement to break. The first instance employment tribunal agreed with this argument.

On appeal the decision was overturned. It follows that workers do not have to ask for a rest break first and then be refused to claim a breach of their entitlement to rest breaks under the Regulations. This decision departs from earlier cases which previously confirmed a breach of the Regulations would only arise when a worker asked for an entitlement and then was refused. It remains to be seen whether the tribunals will adopt a similar approach to annual leave entitlement and other statutory rights.

Following Grange v Abellio London it is certain that the burden is shifted onto the employer to make sure the jobs of their workers are structured in compliance with the Working Time Regulations. Please contact Lawgistics if you have any queries regarding the workers’ rights under the Working Time Regulations.

Kiril Moskovchuk

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.