Worker killed within hours of starting job

legal updates

A cable reel drum jack was used to support the vehicle, which was not an appropriate piece of equipment.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Vehicle recovery and repair company; Essex-based Albert Road Recovery and Repair has been sentenced after a new worker suffered fatal crush injuries during vehicle maintenance work on the first day of his new job.

On 24 November 2014 employee John Glenn was killed when a rigid vehicle fell suddenly from an inadequate axle support prop at Middlemarch Business Park in Coventry.

Birmingham Magistrates’ Court was told that a cable reel drum jack was used to support the vehicle, which was not an appropriate piece of equipment for the task being undertaken. The HSE stated that a suitably rated axle stand should have been used. HSE investigators revealed the company failed to:

  • Adequately induct the new starter into the business;
  • Adequately instruct and supervise him on his first day at work;
  • Provide suitable tools and equipment and
  • Provide approved vehicle repair equipment.

The now dissolved company was found guilty of breaching s 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act. It was fined £20,000, the highest amount available to this court at the time, as the incident took place before an amendment was made to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, removing the limit of fines that can be imposed a Magistrates Court.

Describing the incident as completely avoidable, HSE inspector John Glynn said: “This incident led to the tragic death of John Glenn and occurred within hours of him starting his new job.” He went on to say; “Not only did the company fail to adequately induct the new starter into their business, it failed to adequately instruct and supervise him on his first day and provided him with completely unsuitable tools and equipment. Had the company considered the risks properly, they would have had safe systems of work and approved vehicle repair equipment in place.”

NOTE: Employers operating in the Motor Vehicle Repair (MVT) sector must provide to their employees’ safe plant and safe systems of work. Safe plant means all work equipment must be suitable for the intended purpose and the environment in which it is to be used. The use of axle stands, vehicle jacks and 2-Post and 4-Post vehicle lifts in the vehicle workshop is commonplace. Where used; such equipment must be regularly inspected and (where appropriate subject to Thorough Examination (TE) under LOLER’98. All employers must provide to their employees such information, instruction and training and supervision; as is necessary to ensure their health and safety whilst at work (company induction at the start of their employment) and information and instruction about the employers own safe systems of work. The Company failed to meet these statutory provisions.

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Ernie TaylorHealth & Safety ConsultantRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Toilet provision in the workplace

It’s hard to imagine this sensible judgment was not a relief for all the employees involved in the use of these toilets.

Can my employees tell me it is too hot to work?

Bosses should make sure they are doing all they can to keep their people cool, especially in areas where machinery might generate extra heat.

Managing Home Workers’ Health and Safety

The guidance published by the HSE about home working has been redesigned and expanded to provide more detail on straightforward actions to manage the homeworkers’ health and safety.

Site Supervisor Fined After Worker Suffered Serious Injuries

Remind your Managers and Site Supervisors about their delegated responsibilities for health and safet

HSE update – Control Of Substances Harmful to Health (COSHH)

COSHH requirements will be particularly relevant for any business running a repairs workshop.

Aiming for excellence – 10 Targets for your own risk assessments

We all recognise and understand that risk assessments are a statutory requirement.

Employer Sentenced After Oil Drum Explodes

Fined £80,000 and ordered to pay costs of £8,167.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.