Work out if the correspondence received is credible…

legal updates

Some of our members had received an identical email from a legal solutions firm about the possibility of losing their Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) licence.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We have all been guilty, at some point, of ignoring correspondence from people, such as customers, solicitors, suppliers, councils, etc. And the reason for not responding? It is in the hope that if there is a potential problem, it will just go away. Sadly, a lot of the time it doesn’t and that is when Lawgistics are asked to get involved.

Our advice is if you are unsure as to what any correspondence relates to, then get in touch so we can advise the best course of action to take. A notable example of this happened the other week when we received several telephone calls via our legal helpline concerning a particular issue. Some of our members had received an identical email from a legal solutions firm about the possibility of losing their Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) licence if they did not have certain policies in place. The email’s headline was designed to worry the reader so they would readily part with their hard-earned cash.

To solicit business, this firm was informing motor dealers if they could not evidence a number of policies and procedures they had in place, then the FCA may remove their permissions to provide finance. This company would charge a fee to provide templates for these policies. Now, there was some legitimacy in the email, as the FCA does rely on you running your business correctly and it is always wise to have correct policies and procedures in place, but this was just a blatant attempt to worry our members. And in part, it worked, as we had several members contacting us specifically regarding the email.

Now, a legitimate business using scare tactics could be argued is a perfectly acceptable form of marketing. However, others may disagree!

The key here is to work out if the correspondence received is credible or not. It is noticeable that a number of the alleged mis-sold finance letters sent from solicitors and claims management companies received by our members are being ignored. They believe these letters do not apply to them and consider them to be a scam. Unfortunately, whilst scare tactics are used to make you hand over your money, these letters cannot be ignored. Unfortunately, we have evidence to confirm that court proceedings have been issued because some of our members didn’t respond to a certain correspondence.

Our advice is that if you are unsure, do not delay and forward the correspondence to Lawgistics. We can provide you with the necessary advice as to how to deal with any issues. Different companies are emerging all the time, so be vigilant and make sure you forward any letters promptly.

Automotive ComplianceWE TALK YOUR LANGUAGE, WE KNOW YOUR BUSINESS

Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

John McDougallLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Is the discretionary commission argument finally coming to an end?

Could this be the final chapter in the finance commission scandal that’s plagued the motor trade for years?

Honest guv, it was a mistake!

It is useful to know that if an employee has made a mistake, it is not that employee who is deemed liable.

Did you know that finance companies and brokers are psychic?

Our advice is don’t be bullied by them. But, that advice comes with a warning too.

Important changes to the FLA Lending Code

Independent used vehicle dealers will be required to become SAF-approved or equivalent by 1 January 2025.

DCA Complaints: The FCA’s Extended Timeline and Ongoing Delays

In short, five years after the original banning of discretionary commission arrangements, the FCA will provide a new approach as to how firms should deal with these matters!

Do I have to reply?

The lender writes to our member for assistance with paperwork, but our member decides to ignore it.

Have motor finance lenders scored an own goal?

A clear admission from two large motor finance lenders that they have no clue as to what their dealer networks are doing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.