Who is liable for the accidents of a Manager?

legal_updates

This demonstrates the importance of keeping up to date with your health and safety, and documenting everything when possible.

Author: David Combes
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 9 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In a recent Scottish case, involving a Tyre Services Outlet, in which debate was had over who was liable for an accident which occurred at work, due to the actions of a manager? 

In this case, the Company in question had strict procedures in places for inflating tyres, as it was a commonly known hazard, that without proper care, the tyres could explode, causing injury to the employee and significant damage to the tyre. Tyres where to be placed in cages before inflating, apart from in extreme circumstances where the tyre was too large for the cage. In such a case, the tyre would be inflated using a longer length hose so that staff would be at a safe distance from the tyre to undertake the task at hand. 

A, a manager, was inflating a commercial tyre whilst the tyre was in a bay, leaning against a wall. The tyre was still connected at the time to a solid rim wheel. The tyre suddenly blew out part of the wheel towards A, causing injury to them by way of soft tissue damage to their leg. 

A claimed compensation, for the injury sustained. The Court held that as the Company had been clear and diligent in their application of health and safety, and had procedures in place to prevent such accidents occurring. A should have caged the tyre, as per procedure. Further documentation was provided by the company to show their diligence, by having all staff sign off, once a year that they understood what was required from them in regards to health and safety. The final damming evidence against A was that the Company produced internal safety audits, undertaken by A as a member of management which confirmed that all safety procedures were being followed. 

Whilst this Companies Health and Safety policy may have been a little over the top, having quarterly mangers audits and yearly sign offs, it enabled them to successfully argue a case which could have cost them a considerable sum of money. It demonstrates the importance of keeping up to date with your health and safety, and documenting everything when possible. 

David Combes

In remeberance of David Combes 1948 – 2020

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.