What Constitutes Office Banter and a Claim for Discrimination/harassment?

legal updates

Comparable comments in the work place can lead to discrimination and harassment claims.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Following on from the previous legal update regarding office banter there has recently been heightened media coverage in regards to Charlotte Proudman’s outing a fellow lawyer regarding inappropriate comments.

Recently, barrister Charlotte Proudman used the social media Twitter to post what she had described as a sexist message which she had received from a fellow lawyer on LinkedIn.  LinkedIn is used by many professionals to help broaden their professional network.

Charlotte Proudman received a message which made comment to her profile picture, describing the picture as “stunning” she replied to the message stating she was on LinkedIn for business purposes and not to be approached by “sexist men”.

Comparable comments in the work place can lead to discrimination and harassment claims which incurs costs in defending the claim and damage to the employer’s reputation. Within the cases below, the tribunal noted the lack of discrimination and harassment training within the company’s.

In the recent case of Minto v Wenick Event Hire Ltd, the claimant a female employee received daily remarks that were of the same sexual nature as from the “Carry On” films. During the tribunal, her manager gave evidence that banter which including strong language was part of everyday fact of life.

The tribunal found that this did amount to sex discrimination and harassment.

The tribunal said: “‘Banter’ is a loose expression, covering what otherwise might be abusive behaviour on the basis that those participating do so willingly and on an equal level. It can easily transform into bullying when a subordinate employee effectively has no alternative but to accept/participate in this conduct to keep his or her job.”

Another recent case were an employee was compared to the women on the TV programme “My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding” was held to be harassed. In the case of Harper v Housing 21 the claimant which was Irish complained about her line Manager’s attitude. Her line Managers behaviour included repeatedly likening the Claimant to the women on the TV programme, although the line Manager said her comments were office banter and was not intended to cause any malice.

The employment tribunal upheld claims of direct race discrimination, racial harassment and constructive dismissal.

WeRecruit Auto LtdPermanent Automotive Recruitment from an experienced and trustworthy recruitment partner.

We cover roles within all departments and sectors of the Automotive industry, and are here to listen to your specific needs and find the most suitable candidates to fit your business.

Roxanne BradleyLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Extension of Redundancy Protection for Pregnancy and New Parents

Explore the strengthened redundancy protections for new parents with significant amendments to maternity, adoption, and shared parental leave rights, effective from April 2024, ensuring enhanced job security during critical family milestones.

Wages increasing from 1 April 2024

With effect from 1 April 2024, the hourly rates of pay are…

Employment Law: Carer’s Leave

The regulations explicitly safeguard employees from any detriment or dismissal resulting from taking or seeking to take carer’s leave.

Employment Law: Annual Leave Changes

Several significant changes came into force on 1 January 2024 that affect the statutory annual leave and pay entitlements.

The office Christmas party season is here

Where an employee makes comments concerning a person’s body parts or style of dress that are intended to be good-natured but are perceived as offensive…

Update on Rights to Flexible Working Requests

Employers will remain entitled to turn down a request pointing to reasonable grounds as a basis for refusal.

Three new employment laws for 2024

The Carers Leave Act, The Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act and The Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.