WeRe Bank update

legal_updates

Should you be presented with a WeRe cheque, we would strongly advise you read this update.

Author: Roxanne Bradley
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 5 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A case surrounding the use of cheques from WeRe bank was recently reviewed in the case of Evans v Santander UK Central London CC 2016.

Background on WeRe Bank

WeRe is a UK based company which purported to be the peoples bank and appeared to have created its own currency, RE. Members were required to issue a promissory note to WeRe Bank for the sum of £150,000 which was payable within 10 years from the time of joining. Members were then able to by RE cheque books. WeRe Stated the cheques could be used to pay all public liability and private payments. WeRe’s website stated under Bills of Exchange Act 1882 ss42 and 43, if a payment was refused, the payee was acting in dishonour and liability for the payment ceased. The details on the cheque being the sort code and account number were invalid and were the same details WeRe bank issued to every member.

Evans issued 3 cheques to Santander UK amounting to £640,000 to discharge his liability under buy to let mortgages he had with the lender. Santander refused the bank cheques. Evan then issued proceedings for a declaration that his liability had been discharge. Santander UK applied for summary judgement.

Evans claim was dismissed and it was ruled the lender was under no obligation to accept the worthless cheques issued by WeRe Bank.

Our advice previously given remains unchanged. Should you be presented with a WeRe cheque, we would strongly advise you read the above case as well as the warning given previously by the FCA.

Roxanne Bradley

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.