Vehicle Safety Recalls – how it affects car retailers

legal updates

The law states the retailer must 'take measures' in order to cooperate efficiently. Doing nothing is not an option.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A client recently raised a query about the position of used motor retailers and VOSA safety recall information. 

Firstly the legal position… 

The General Product Safety Regulations 2005 require all retailers (large and small):

a) To not expose/offer for sale or sell which is known/presumed, on the basis of information in his possession, and is a professional, to be a dangerous product. There is overlap here with the legislation on selling unroadworthy vehicles (which doesn’t require the seller to actually know a vehicle is unroadworthy – it is an absolute offence).  It could however cover a situation concerning safety, not covered by an MOT test.  For instance, if a sun roof mechanism has a sharp edge that could easily chop off your finger, or an accelerator pedal intermittently gets stuck down due to a badly fitting carpet and so on

b) To monitor the safety of the cars offered for sale in particular by
– Passing on risk information;
– Keeping and producing documentation to trace product origins;
– Cooperating with manufacturers/VOSA to avoid risks.

The law goes on to say, however, that the retailer must ‘take measures’ in order to cooperate efficiently.  Doing nothing is not an option.

In an ideal world there should be a joined up system so that the dealer can readily check whether all safety recalls have been acted upon. If they haven’t then manufacturer franchises should welcome independent dealers referring vehicles with missing recalls.  Would this happen even if the information is available? VOSA are aware of the issues and are moving to having the information provided with the MOT history.  It is likely to be 2015 before it is up and running.  Some manufacturers’ websites will allow you to check Registration Numbers to identify vehicles with outstanding safety recalls so it is not a total impossibility.

The failure to take any steps is a criminal offence, although we are not aware of any prosecutions as yet.  However from a civil law point of view, since it is a statutory duty the door is very much open for a claim for negligence if someone should be injured/killed in the event of you selling a vehicle without having taken whatever steps you could have.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Cost of living increase

With the increase in cost for just about everything, we anticipate that consumers will be feeling the squeeze and therefore, will either seek to reject vehicles or request for repairs to be undertaken.

What’s that pain between your shoulders? It’s the Trading Standards’ knife in your back!

Trading Standards are meant to provide help and suggestions to ensure future compliance.

Ambush! – Application to revisit determined arguments and introduce new claims refused

The judge merely allowed for fixed costs in accordance with the Small Claims Track cost regime

Opportunistic and misconceived claim for psychological harm struck out at a preliminary hearing

Consumer seeking to throw everything and the kitchen sink at our member in the vain hope that something might just stick

Why did you replace that? That must prove it was faulty!

The customer rejected the vehicle under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA) on the basis that it was within 30 days of purchase and the vehicle was not of satisfactory quality or fit for purpose.

Divorcing couples and their cars

The vast majority of cases are not theft. They are civil disputes and for this reason we would initially recommend speaking to a solicitor or Citizens Advice.

Get it in writing

Besides being an account of entirely unreasonable customer behaviour, this is an example of what can go wrong with oral agreements.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.