Author: Jason Williams
Published: August 19, 2019
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 3 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
So was the outcome of a recent hearing in which Lawgistics have been wrongly cited as a Co-Defendant and one of our legal advisors was actually in attendance to give evidence as a witness to its defence and offer support to our members cause as required.
The Consumer attended Court with a bundle of papers having previously failed to file and serve a witness statement and all relevant documents in support of his claim contrary to previous directions of the Court.
The Consumer claimed that he had not received such directions despite deemed service and the Judge accepted his explanation and humble apology.
A suitable unless order was made against the Consumer compelling compliance with the Courts previous directions and in default his claim will be struck out without further order.
Given the above, the Consumer was ordered to pay our witness expenses for the day, in any event.
What’s more, our legal advisor even managed to find a seat on the next fast train from Kings Cross!