Slippy path to being sued…


Limit the risk of slipping for employees or visitors to your site.

Author: Roxanne Bradley
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 5 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Its winter and we are all feeling the cold. During such cold weather, when there is a risk of icy conditions remember to try and limit the risk of slipping for employees or visitors to your site.

October 2014, we saw the most significant case regarding this. A home care worker slipped on a path whilst visiting an elderly lady’s home. The employee was wearing flat shows with some ridging on the soles but she still fell on the iced footpath and fractured her wrist. Initially the Court found in her favour and against the employer. However the employer filed for an appeal and the case went to the Supreme Court and the same conclusion was met again.

The Court did review the company’s approach to risk assessment. Years prior to the accident, the company had identified the potential for slipping on icy surfaces. Whilst the hazard was naturally occurring this did not absolve the employer from taking action – equally the same as employers are responsible for protecting employees from extremely hot or wet weather whilst at work.

The Court also found the employer has breached the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 as they had not provided specific details relating to the appropriate footwear further the Court deemed the company could have provided non slip overshoes.  

So the point from this to take onboard –

If your staff travel during winter then it may be worth investing in non slip overshoes which are less than £20.00 and have been shown to be effective with reducing the risk of slipping. If doing so, you can request the employee to sign a document which states they have been informed and provided with slip overshoes to be worn in icy conditions.

Roxanne Bradley

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.