Preliminary hearings for new cases will default to telephone or video


The average time taken for a case to conclude has risen to 48 weeks, which is an increase of 12 weeks.

Author: Roxanne Bradley
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 5 months old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We’ve mentioned this previously, but it looks like remote hearings are here to stay!

Due to COVID-19, hearings for the courts including tribunals, have changed operations in order for the hearings to be conducted remotely by either a video platform or by telephone.

At Lawgistics, we have experienced issues with remote hearings such as technology problems, extra preparation being required, and hearings not taking place at all with no explanation! It could also be argued that it has been a disadvantage to some cases and it’s more difficult to cross-examine the other party plus you no longer get “your day in court”.  However, the advantages of remote hearings are less travel which minimises the disruption to the workday and less expense incurred.

Currently, employment tribunals are facing a backlog of claims which began before the pandemic.  Based on the government’s figures, from October through to December 2020, claims had increased by 25% compared to the same quarter of the previous year. The cause of the increase is most likely from the rise in unemployment and changes to working conditions during the pandemic. Furthermore, the average time taken for a case to conclude has risen to 48 weeks, which is an increase of 12 weeks as compared to 2019.

On 31st March 2021, a new roadmap was set out for tribunals which details the default arrangements for the listing of new cases, with the majority of hearings continuing to be conducted remotely. Until March 2022, all preliminary hearings for new cases will default to telephone or video. However, final hearings will vary by region.

We assume remote hearings will also remain part of county court proceedings. 

Roxanne Bradley

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.