Out of this world recovery/repair bills

legal updates

While you may argue that he should have taken out breakdown cover, the dealer cannot use this as a bullet-proof shield.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We are sometimes asked to advise on the thorny issue of the cost of repatriation, where perhaps a car is sold to a customer who leaves the showroom for a pre-planned holiday in sunny climes, excited by the prospect of a long and fun-filled journey in the new motor, accompanied by his wife, six children, the mother-in-law and an incontinent dog.

While it may have seemed a great idea to trail off to Lake Garda without any previous long-distance testing of the new machine, it might look like a triumph of optimism over reality when the car expires at the top of the Stelvio Pass, gasping its last as it splutters to a despairing halt in the middle of nowhere. Invariably when a car breaks down, it is in a mobile telephone dead spot, leaving the owner to wait forlornly in the hope of flagging down another car to send for help. When eventually they are rescued and put up in a local chicken- infested barn while the car is repaired, it is likely that the poor customer will turn his attention to the cost of all this misfortune and who should pay it.

Generally, the Consumer Rights Act requires that where goods fail within the first six months of ownership and that failure can be attributed to a fault present at the point of sale, the customer is entitled to ask that the fault be put right at no cost to him. His three rights (repair, replacement or refund) remain intact, notwithstanding that the conversation has, by force, to take place over a distance of thousands of miles. The test is always one of reasonableness. If the customer told the selling dealer that he intended to go abroad straight away, it was incumbent upon the dealer to make sure car was fit for that purpose and if not, he should have advised against purchase. If there comes a point where a decision needs to be made about whether to repair locally or repatriate the car and family, a balance must be struck between what is sensible, reasonable and most cost-effective, while protecting the consumer’s rights. While you may argue that he should have taken out breakdown cover, the dealer cannot use this as a bullet-proof shield to escape the potential bill.

We very recently had to advise a dealer who sold a Tesla to a certain Mr E Musk of no fixed abode, who complained that his sportscar had suffered an infuriating failure of its in-car entertainment system, which continuously looped David Bowie singing “Space Oddity”. In questioning the wisdom of repatriating the car for repair we recommended that the dealer should take account of the distance he might have to send the RAC to recover it. At the time of writing this, the car was some 750,000 miles away and heading in the wrong direction at 20,000mph!

Ultimately a dealer should not allow repair or recovery costs to become astronomical!


Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

Philip StricklandLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Deposit and Fair Contractual Terms

Explore the intricacies of contract commitments and the bounds of consumer rights in our latest analysis, where a £3000 deposit dispute underscores the significance of clear terms and buyer responsibilities.

Maintaining professionalism in customer disputes

Your emails may be presented to a judge for review to help decide on how you have handled the matter before the court’s involvement.

Assist your consumer… before it’s too late

If a consumer is ignored or refused assistance by you, and a repair is carried out, you will no longer be able to inspect the failed component.

What? You want me to pay after nearly 6 years?

After 5 years, 8 months, and 41,000 miles, there was a problem with the vehicle, and it ultimately required a new engine costing £4,600.

Consequential Losses

General stress and anxiety is not recoverable, otherwise everybody would claim it, similarly the time spent in dealing with a claim is generally not recoverable.

Car sold with a fault

Ensure the consumer is aware, understands, and most importantly, accepts the vehicle is subject to fault.

What you pay for is what you get

The consumer presented our member with the bill because they wrongly thought they had the right to do what they wanted.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.