This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
Looking ahead to April, wage increase
From the 01 April 2018 the minimum wage will increase to the below:
HowdenCompetitive, comprehensive, quick
One of the largest independent specialist motor trade brokers in the UK. Our extensive history of supplying insurance to the motor trade means we understand your business needs. By partnering with a specialist insurance broker like us, you get exactly what you need to protect your business.
Car Trouble Years Later: Who’s to Blame, the Customer or the Trader?
When a fault surfaces years after a sale, who carries the burden under the Consumer Rights Act 2015? Here’s the quick guide traders need to protect their position and respond confidently.
Rejection Rights Aren’t ‘Refund on Demand’: What the CRA 2015 Really Expects
A vociferous rejection doesn’t trump the trader’s right to inspect or make a fair deduction for use. We unpack what “agreement” really means under the CRA 2015.
Distance Selling Rules Bite Back: Customer Loses Final Appeal in Tesla Case
A customer tried the same Tesla refund playbook twice. The first worked, the second did not, because one dealer lacked an organised distance sales scheme, and the courts have now shut the door on any further appeal.
Sold a Car and Now They Want a Refund? The Truth About “No Mental Capacity”
A refund demand lands after the sale, claiming the buyer lacked mental capacity. Here’s how to handle these calls, what actually counts as evidence, and when a contract could be void.
