Mediation appointments: the court’s take on ‘delays’

legal updates

You can tell the court you’re unavailable, but will that stop a telephone mediation being listed? In our client’s case it didn’t, and the refusal to move it now means a full hearing next year.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

When we send a Directions Questionnaire to a client involved in litigation, it asks for any dates they are unavailable during a specified period.

The author has just penned another legal update where we ask clients to tell us of any changes to their availability after the initial period given in the Directions Questionnaire, so that we can notify the court accordingly.

However, it seems this non-availability information does not apply to the telephone mediation appointments used before a full court hearing.

One of our clients responded to the Directions Questionnaire advising of non-availability ‘for the whole of September 2025’.

We then received a court order listing a telephone mediation for 8 September 2025.

We pointed out what was stated in the Directions Questionnaire.

We were told the mediation could not be delayed for that long; it was a take-it-or-leave-it choice.

Our client is on the other side of the world during September 2025 and cannot attend a telephone mediation.

The irony is that the case will now proceed to a court hearing without mediation, in about a year’s time!

Of course, some may say that the system should be more flexible in attempting to resolve disputes without having to go to court. Others may argue that litigants should be willing to take mediation calls in the middle of the night if it means not having to go to court unless absolutely necessary.

HowdenCompetitive, comprehensive, quick

One of the largest independent specialist motor trade brokers in the UK. Our extensive history of supplying insurance to the motor trade means we understand your business needs. By partnering with a specialist insurance broker like us, you get exactly what you need to protect your business.

Whatever your personal view, one thing seems certain: mediation appointments need to be taken when offered, as they are unlikely to be rearranged by more than a few days.

If you have faced a similar scheduling issue with mediation, our legal team at Lawgistics can liaise with the court and protect your position. Call our telephone helpline or speak to our casework team for support.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Witness Statements: Own the Weakness and Turn Up to Court

Courts are scrutinising credibility more than ever. A Witness Statement that ducks its weak points or a witness who fails to attend risks serious damage to their case

Broker Falls Flat: Court Dismisses Flimsy Claim Against Dealer

A County Court ruling has reinforced the importance of solid evidence and clear contracts, rejecting a broker’s claim against a car dealer over an alleged pre-existing fault.

Small Claims and Expert Fees: Understanding the £750 Cap

Parties should carefully consider the necessity and proportionality of obtaining expert evidence to avoid incurring irrecoverable costs.

Buyer Beware: £4K Discovery claim falls flat in court

An opportunistic claim for nearly £9,000 on a £4,000 used vehicle was thrown out by the court, reinforcing the principle of caveat emptor in business-to-business sales.

Two Years of Lawgistics Litigation Support

Since launching Lawgistics Litigation for the Motor Trade, we’ve saved our members over £2.6 million in court claims.

Of Pedantry and Pleadings

From faulty sat navs to forgotten responsibilities, we explore how modern claims are testing the limits of common sense in legal disputes.

Concise or Incomplete? The challenges of vague pleadings by litigants in person

As online claims get shorter, your courtroom strategy needs to get sharper. Here’s why.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.