Mediation appointments: the court’s take on ‘delays’

legal updates

You can tell the court you’re unavailable, but will that stop a telephone mediation being listed? In our client’s case it didn’t, and the refusal to move it now means a full hearing next year.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

When we send a Directions Questionnaire to a client involved in litigation, it asks for any dates they are unavailable during a specified period.

The author has just penned another legal update where we ask clients to tell us of any changes to their availability after the initial period given in the Directions Questionnaire, so that we can notify the court accordingly.

However, it seems this non-availability information does not apply to the telephone mediation appointments used before a full court hearing.

One of our clients responded to the Directions Questionnaire advising of non-availability ‘for the whole of September 2025’.

We then received a court order listing a telephone mediation for 8 September 2025.

We pointed out what was stated in the Directions Questionnaire.

We were told the mediation could not be delayed for that long; it was a take-it-or-leave-it choice.

Our client is on the other side of the world during September 2025 and cannot attend a telephone mediation.

The irony is that the case will now proceed to a court hearing without mediation, in about a year’s time!

Of course, some may say that the system should be more flexible in attempting to resolve disputes without having to go to court. Others may argue that litigants should be willing to take mediation calls in the middle of the night if it means not having to go to court unless absolutely necessary.

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Whatever your personal view, one thing seems certain: mediation appointments need to be taken when offered, as they are unlikely to be rearranged by more than a few days.

If you have faced a similar scheduling issue with mediation, our legal team at Lawgistics can liaise with the court and protect your position. Call our telephone helpline or speak to our casework team for support.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

To strike or not to strike

Courts are reluctant to strike out a claim or defence, even where there are procedural breaches. Here’s when CPR 3.4(2) genuinely applies, why summary judgment under Part 24 may be a better route, and what judges look for before taking the drastic step.

Don’t Ignore That Claim Form: How to stop enforcement and protect your credit

Got a claim form through the door? Here’s what to do first, how to avoid a County Court Judgment, what happens if enforcement starts, and when it’s smarter to settle and move on.

Default judgment but no claim form?

Here’s how to act quickly, get the paperwork you need, and give yourself the best chance of setting the judgment aside under rule 13.3.

Importance of taking your customers’ details!

Garages aren’t legally required to take a customer’s address before repair or sale, but skipping it can stall Torts notices and court action when vehicles are abandoned or not collected.

Witness Statements: Own the Weakness and Turn Up to Court

Courts are scrutinising credibility more than ever. A Witness Statement that ducks its weak points or a witness who fails to attend risks serious damage to their case

Broker Falls Flat: Court Dismisses Flimsy Claim Against Dealer

A County Court ruling has reinforced the importance of solid evidence and clear contracts, rejecting a broker’s claim against a car dealer over an alleged pre-existing fault.

Small Claims and Expert Fees: Understanding the £750 Cap

Parties should carefully consider the necessity and proportionality of obtaining expert evidence to avoid incurring irrecoverable costs.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.