Limitation Act 1980

legal updates

Whilst six years is a long period of time, bringing a successful claim after a period of time is difficult!

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Often we are asked by a client, what is the time frame within which a consumer can bring a claim.

The Limitation Act 1980 sets out the time limits in which a claim can be brought. The legislation is in place to help limit the exposure to litigation for wrongful acts.

Over a period of time it becomes more difficult as things will change, such as a witnesses memory of the events or evidence available which allows a judge to properly review the case.

The limitation period is dependent on the action. If a claim is brought by a claimant out of the time frame, then the Defendant will be able to plead limitation as a defence and the Claimant shall then have the burden of proving that the cause of action did arise within the relevant statutory timeframe.

Once a claim from is received by a court, then the time stops running. Therefore, if parties are in settlement negotiations and the limitation expiry date is approaching then quite often the Claimant will commence proceedings whilst then putting the timeframe on hold. This allows the parties to continue negotiations without the worry of being out of time to bring a claim.

Here are some of the key limitation time periods which may be of interest;

  • Claims for negligence (other than personal injury or death) must be made within six years from the date of the negligent act/omission. But, if the claim involves physical damage, the start date for the limitation period is from the date of the damage, not the act which causes damage.
  • Claims for personal injury or death must be made within three years of the negligent act/omission or knowledge.
  • Claims for fraud must be made within six years of the date the cause of action accrued. Time does not begin until the fraud has, or with reasonable diligence would have been, exposed, if the defendant purposely covers any fact relevant to the cause of action.
  • To enforce a judgment it must be brought within six years of the date upon which the judgment became enforceable.

The one which will be applicable to our clients;

  • Contract claims must be brought within six years of the date of breach.

Whilst six years is a long period of time, bringing a successful claim after a period of time is difficult! If you sold a car and the consumer is attempting to reject it twelve months later then the burden of proof is upon them.

Which means, it is down to them to prove the vehicle was faulty at the point of sale and there is a breach of contract.

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Roxanne BradleyLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.