Lawgistics – more than just legal consultants…


Failure to reply to court papers can have disastrous consequences.

Author: Jason Williams
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 9 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We are dealing with a case whereby because of our client’s geographical remoteness he has difficulty in being located by the postman.  This has resulted in him not receiving important court documents.  

As we deal with thousands of enquiries and cases it would be impossible for our clients to use our address to receive court papers.  But given the uniqueness of the situation and the strength of our client’s case we wanted to make an exception and we thought we had agreed with the court that they would use our address in order to ensure that our client could receive future papers from them.  We would, as a ‘one-off’, scan and send them by email or by fax. 

However, the Judge declined such a suggestion with the following: “the Defendant must give his address for service [but] not that of the solicitor who is advising him and acting merely as a post-box”.  Now, I’ve been called many things in my time but never a post-box and certainly not ‘merely’ so!

But it brings about a serious point.  If you suspect or know that you will not receive expected court papers at your place of work for whatever reason then you can put your residential address instead.  But this in turn causes another problem, do you really want consumers to know where you live?

In that case you have to apply to the court to ask for an Order that allows service of documents to be sent to an alternative address. Not that this is intended to be a criticism of any kind but that all seems to be a little unnecessary.  Surely the greater benefit is for a claimant or defendant to simply be able to specify an address that will ensure he receives the court’s papers without having to ask the court’s permission first?

And so if you are going to be away from work for a while and you are expecting court papers, do please ensure that someone is briefed as to what to do with them in your absence, even if it is to simply contact us for advice.  Failure to reply to court papers can have disastrous consequences so do all you can to ensure that going on holiday this year does not cost you your business.

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.