Key worker claim dismissed

legal updates

They presented witness statements from family members to back their claims of various things our client was supposed to have said.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We recently helped a client win a case in which the customer wanted to return their hybrid vehicle because they claimed it was costing them more in fuel bills than their previous vehicle which was a diesel.

The customer used their occupation as a key worker presumably to try and elicit sympathy. They presented witness statements from family members to back their claims of various things our client was supposed to have said.

Fortunately, the judge was only interested in the facts and as the customer did not present any fuel receipts, any evidence of what they alleged our client had said (apart from testimonies of relatives who are hardly going to say otherwise) or any actual figures of MPG, the court ruled that the customer’s claim was not proven and as such, the claim was dismissed and our client won.

Customers will often get relatives to write statements to back up their version of events and either dramatize a situation: “the inside light not working could have led to my disabled, elderly great aunt being killed”, seek sympathy via their occupation (usually as a key worker), or even try and claim their version of the truth should automatically triumph over the word of a car dealer just because they are a barrister or a police officer or in one recent case, an accountant.

Fortunately, most judges are interested in facts and so despite some car dealers’ belief that they will always get a raw deal from the courts, we know from experience that this is not always the case. There are no guarantees but preparation and presentation count for a lot and as experts in our field, we are uniquely placed to assist motor dealers to a positive outcome as we have their backs.

HR ManagerSo simple even a child could use it

HR Manager is designed to assist employers manage their legal obligations in relation to Employment Law, Human Resources, Health & Safety and Data Protection. Fully utilising HR Manager will demonstrate best practice, assist in the meeting of legal obligations and show due diligence.

Nona BowkisLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

The law is not an exact science

We have all had surefire winners fail due to the smallest issue, but equally, we have all won cases that we had no right to.

A reasonable price to be paid for a service

The defendant paid only a portion of the invoice, promising to pay the remainder in good time, and took the vehicle.

It’s official – the Civil Procedure Rules are no longer “New”!

One might reasonably ask oneself: “Why is any of this of interest to me?”

Can an entire family bring court proceedings for an alleged defective car?

Luckily the Ruffles’ family dog didn’t turn up either as no doubt Pooch would have been allowed a woof on the witness stand too!

The court finds car dealer partly liable for damage caused by the removal of a sticker!

Due to COVID-19, the court held an Early Neutral Evaluation, a 30-minute telephone assessment of each party’s position.

Introduction of Small Claims Paper Determination Pilot Scheme

If you receive or issue a court claim which is subject to the pilot scheme, preparation of your claim or defence and statements will be crucial.

The real difference between claims under and over £10k

Litigation isn’t always just about having a strong argument, there are many factors that can help you win a case and reduce your risk.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.