It is the substance that counts


No fair dismissal procedure was followed and procedurally the dismissal was unfair.

Author: Kiril Moskovchuk
Reading time: 1 minute

This article is 3 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal judgement from Edinburgh reiterates the principle that any award in unfair dismissal may be reduced, even down to zero, if the employer had substantive fair grounds to dismiss.

The claimant was employed as a bar steward. Under her watch two cases of vodka went missing, for which she accepted at least partial responsibility. She was given a final written warning. While the warning was live, she refused, without a good reason, to sell tickets to a social event. Her justification that she was not prepared to accept the extra responsibility of handling the cash from ticket sales as she was on the final warning was rejected. Dismissal followed.

The Employment Tribunal found, which was upheld on appeal that no fair dismissal procedure was followed and procedurally the dismissal was unfair. Had the correct procedure been followed, it was certain the claimant still would have would have been dismissed and on this basis, applying what is known as Polkey principle, her compensation award was reduced to nil.

Kiril Moskovchuk

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.