Happy Birthday Consumer Rights Act

legal updates

Dealers must remember that not all faults are equal when deciding how to work with a customer who has reported a fault.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In our experience, the CRA has worked quite well for car dealers despite anomalies such as the ‘one repair rule’. 

This one repair rule is fine for less complex items but for modern day used cars, it is really not fit for purpose as sometimes we need to complete repairs by process of elimination and sometimes, two things will go wrong in relatively quick succession for no particular reason.

However, dealers must remember that not all faults are equal when deciding how to work with a customer who has reported a fault.

Firstly, if the report is reported in the first 30 days, this does not automatically mean that the customer can get a refund. For the customer to be eligible for a refund, the customer has to:

1.    Prove there is a fault;
2.    Prove the fault was there at the point of sale, and
3.    Prove the fault is ‘worthy’ of a refund.

In terms of worthiness, a new coil pack is unlikely to make a £5000 used car worthy of a refund as it’s a relatively quick and relatively easy fix. However, if the gearbox failed as they drove off the forecourt, then yes the customer is probably entitled to their money back although there is nothing wrong with offering a repair.

After 30 days, similar common sense should apply and so if the coil pack has been changed but a warning light comes up to suggest a tyre new sensor is required, this will not entitle the customer to a refund under the ‘one repair rule’ as a sensor does not make that £5000 used car not of satisfactory quality or not fit for purpose – it is just a minor fault.  

Customers, spurred on by headline advice which bypasses the crucial nuances of the law, can get carried away and start demanding all sorts. If you have any doubts about your rights when dealing with a tricky customer, Lawgistics Members do have the benefit of the Legal Helpline and can call and talk to our Consumer Rights experts to check their position.  

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Don’t Get Soaked: The Habitation Checks That Stop Motorhome Rejections

Buyers are rejecting motorhomes for damp, leaks and unsafe cabins. Here’s what to inspect in the habitation area and why a simple pre-sale check can save you a costly Consumer Rights Act dispute.

Can You Claim What You Haven’t Lost? The ‘No Loss’ Principle Meets s19 CRA 2015

A live claim against a member raises a sharp question: if no money has changed hands and only deductions are in dispute, has the claimant suffered a recoverable loss?

To Repair or Not to Repair: that is the question

A customer drops off a car three months after purchase and asks for a refund. You might have a right to repair, but touch a spanner without clear permission and you could turn a winnable case into an unwanted rejection.

Winter Is Coming: Stop Seasonal Complaints Before They Start

Winter faults spark a spike in consumer complaints. A few extra pre-sale checks now can save you a world of hassle when the temperature drops.

The Consumer Rights Act 2015: Bête noire or useful tool?

Section 19(14) isn’t a magic wand for consumers, and Sections 23 and 24 give traders real leverage. Here’s how to use repairs, disproportionality and usage deductions to keep disputes under control.

Sale or Return: Why “Private Sale” won’t save you from Consumer Rights Act responsibilities

Dealers using Sale or Return cannot hide behind “private sale” labels unless the agency position is made crystal clear from the advert onward. Miss that step and you risk CRA 2015 claims and a DMCCA 2024 breach.

30 Days to Hand the Keys Back: How the Short-Term Right to Reject Really Works

Think a new fault lets buyers walk away, no questions asked? Not quite. Discover why the burden of proof is on the consumer, and how dealers can stay one step ahead.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.