Goodwill Repairs

legal updates

There is always the one customer who is looking for all they can get and will take advantage of your generosity.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Many dealerships will have a policy on when to allow goodwill repairs.  Goodwill repairs may be offered because the warranty has just run out, the problem is recurring due to user error, or because the customer is a complainer.  Most customers will accept these gestures for what they are.

But there is always the one customer who is looking for all they can get and will take advantage of your generosity.

There is a danger that a goodwill repair to an issue that was perfectly satisfactory at the point of sale or has been presented to you as being listed under the Consumer Rights Act, gives the customer the impression the issue is the dealer’s responsibility and there was a problem with the vehicle when they bought it.

By making a repair, you are taking ownership of the problem. The repair needs to resolve the issue brought to you in the first place or else you may be pursued on the basis that your repair caused the fault that is now being complained about.  A goodwill repair can infer an extension to the warranty or that there is a warranty on the new parts.  If you believe the issue has been caused by the customer’s use or modification, your repairs can mask the true cause of the original problem and make it difficult to prove further down the line.  

If legal proceedings are issued, goodwill repairs can also make it more difficult to argue there was nothing wrong with the vehicle when first purchased. Judges do not need too much persuading to conclude that a vehicle was faulty at the point of sale. 


This does not mean that goodwill repairs should not be carried out. They are an important tool in generating repeat custom, especially as for many consumers how a complaint is dealt with can say far more than how the sale was dealt with. However, it is important you document your decision by making it clear it is a goodwill repair – it is not under the warranty, there is no warranty for any new part(s) provision, and it is in no way an admission the vehicle has any defects or issues.  

If you have any questions, contact the Lawgistics legal team on 01480 455500.

MotorDeskA car dealership management platform that combines all the tools your business needs into a single, unified and modern platform.

Available on all your devices via your web browser or the dedicated MotorDesk desktop and mobile apps.

Darren FletcherLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

The customer isn’t always right…

As it was a defect he knew about, he cannot now claim it renders the vehicle not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

On your Marks… Get Set… Doh!

The TSO told our member that the consumer ought not to have experienced a failure given the age and mileage of the car.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.