Full Service History – The hidden danger

legal updates

The niceties of plain and simple language with a strict interpretation are not the issue.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Of course when describing a vehicle as having “full service history” it is not only the consumer who avidly reads the advertisement.

The Trading Standards Office, looking for a “quick nick”, also takes interest. They will compare what is written with the evidence presented and then see if the Consumer Protection from Unfair Contracts Regulations has been breached.

The niceties of plain and simple language with a strict interpretation are not the issue. Instead it is what is implied or may be understood by the average consumer that is paramount. A lease vehicle, the subject of three long term leases, is not a one owner vehicle but three. A driving school vehicle may be a one owner vehicle but if you fail to mention its history then you are guilty of the sin of omission. Similarly if you indicate  “fsh” and omit to say that it has been in a shunt requiring remedial bodywork then that too will be an offence even though acceptable under the Sale of Goods Act.

All this, however, is now changing by virtue of amending regulations making a claim for compensation available to the consumer where an offence is proven. This in turn will be strengthened by the new “Consumer Rights Bill”.

So the moral of this story is to be careful of what you write.  As with FSH, be clear.. Less is best and only say what you can prove with hard evidence. If there is something that does not help the sale, hiding it maybe an offence and cost you dear.

If in doubt ask LAWGISTICS

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

David CombesIn remembrance of David Combes 1948 – 2020Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

New & Improved?

Defending proceedings issued relating to whether the lack of a CD player in a new car was an “upgrade” or not.

Inspecting part-exchange vehicles

It is always a good idea to keep a paper trail for any transaction, especially in situations where representations are being made by a consumer.

Commission Disclosure Court Cases

The majority of the cases where court proceedings have been issued about commission disclosure are because our members have either ignored the correspondence or just decided not to engage with these fine upstanding companies.

Do NOT try to take away a consumer’s rights on an invoice

A Welsh Trading Standards department prosecuted a car dealer for “Furnishing a used car invoice to a consumer giving the impression that the consumer had less rights than they actually did.”

Misleading adverts results in £58,000 fine

The result should serve as a warning to all traders to ensure vehicles are accurately described.

What’s that pain between your shoulders? It’s the Trading Standards’ knife in your back!

Trading Standards are meant to provide help and suggestions to ensure future compliance.

Customer ordered to pay our client’s court costs in mileage dispute

A mileage disclaimer sticker was also displayed on dashboard at the time of sale, advising that the mileage must be deemed incorrect unless otherwise stated in writing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.