Full Service History – The hidden danger


The niceties of plain and simple language with a strict interpretation are not the issue.

Author: David Combes
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 7 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Of course when describing a vehicle as having “full service history” it is not only the consumer who avidly reads the advertisement.

The Trading Standards Office, looking for a “quick nick”, also takes interest. They will compare what is written with the evidence presented and then see if the Consumer Protection from Unfair Contracts Regulations has been breached.

The niceties of plain and simple language with a strict interpretation are not the issue. Instead it is what is implied or may be understood by the average consumer that is paramount. A lease vehicle, the subject of three long term leases, is not a one owner vehicle but three. A driving school vehicle may be a one owner vehicle but if you fail to mention its history then you are guilty of the sin of omission. Similarly if you indicate  “fsh” and omit to say that it has been in a shunt requiring remedial bodywork then that too will be an offence even though acceptable under the Sale of Goods Act.

All this, however, is now changing by virtue of amending regulations making a claim for compensation available to the consumer where an offence is proven. This in turn will be strengthened by the new “Consumer Rights Bill”.

So the moral of this story is to be careful of what you write.  As with FSH, be clear.. Less is best and only say what you can prove with hard evidence. If there is something that does not help the sale, hiding it maybe an offence and cost you dear.

If in doubt ask LAWGISTICS

David Combes

In remeberance of David Combes 1948 – 2020

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.