Author: David Combes
Published: July 8, 2013
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 9 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
In a recent case reported by HSE a tyre collection and recycling company were prosecuted for failing to have a safe system of stacking tyres of varying sizes and shapes.
Although this is unlikely to happen in most workshops it could and it may apply to other ‘stacks’ of items which are liable to fall.
The teenager was trapped by the leg when a bale of tyres weighing almost a tonne fell on him. In fact, it broke his pelvis, left foot, ankle, leg, right arm, hand and wrist and fractured two bones in his neck. He also suffered deep cuts to his trapped leg.
The company were fined £8000 and ordered to pay costs of £4722.