Expert evidence in Scotland and Northern Ireland

legal updates

Importantly, while the source may differ, the general themes relating to expert evidence and the approach adopted by the courts are broadly the same across all three jurisdictions.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Given the complex and technical nature of motor vehicles, when things go wrong, we are often asked to advise on the provision of expert evidence, which can be crucial and the difference between winning or losing.

In England and Wales, the relevant rules appear in Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and are easy enough to understand and follow, even for a layperson.

In Scotland, there is no equivalent rule that sets out what is required but direction can be found in relevant case law, which is a little more challenging to find and interpret for the uninitiated.

Indeed, much the same considerations apply both North and South of the border about the provision of expert evidence and relate to matters such as the experts overriding duty to assist the court, the facts and assumptions that may be considered and commented on by the expert, his/her relevant knowledge, qualifications and expertise, admissibility and reliability of the expert, and disclosure of prior connections.

In Northern Ireland, the High Court of Northern Ireland issued a “game changing” Practice Direction in 2019 on point, which emphasises the extent of the duty owed by anyone instructed to give or prepare expert evidence for or in contemplation of court proceedings.

Importantly, while the source may differ, the general themes relating to expert evidence and the approach adopted by the courts are broadly the same across all three jurisdictions.

What is equally clear across the board, a report on the back of an envelope from a local “friendly” garage is not likely to cut the mustard!

As ever, if you have any doubts, queries, or concerns, then speak with Lawgistics.

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

To Be or Not To Be Remains the Legal Question

The Claimant had sought to reject a commercial van that he had been using for business purposes but alleged that he was a consumer.

Always Deal with Court Documents

This cost our member an application fee to the court, plus a legal representative at court for the hearing.

Warning to all! You must follow the orders of the court!

Had the consumer been reasonable, this issue could have been resolved without going to court.

Claim struck out for non-attendance

A twelve year old van, had been sold to a business without a warranty and more than 130,000 miles on the clock.

Consequential loss: “There has to be a limit for which the defendant is held responsible.”

The consumer argued that she was unable to buy another vehicle since she could not afford one, hence the scale of her claim for transport costs.

What? You want me to pay after nearly 6 years?

After 5 years, 8 months, and 41,000 miles, there was a problem with the vehicle, and it ultimately required a new engine costing £4,600.

Don’t be late!!!

As our member was leaving the court, the Claimant arrived, approximately 15 minutes after the allotted time.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.