Author: Roxanne Bradley
Published: January 19, 2016
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 6 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
We recently heard the decision from the European Court of Human Rights which ruled that employers can justify reading workers private online messages.
The Judge ruled that employers have the right to check that employees were completing their work and that the employee had breached the company’s rules by sending messages on work time.
The case itself concerned an employee using Yahoo messenger to speak with his family and professional contacts whilst he was at work.
The employee was dismissed, the company did have policies in place which stated it was forbidden to use computers and other equipment for personal purposes.
The employee was present with a 45 page transcript of his messages which were personal in nature. The employee claimed the company had breached his right to privacy under the European Convention of Human Rights.
The court ruled that it was reasonable for an employer to check employees were carrying out the tasks for which they were being paid and that checking their employees Yahoo messages was simply them doing that. Not an invasion of the individual’s privacy. However, the Court did state the ruling did not give employers the power for unregulated snooping on private messages and that a set of policies should be in place stating what communications can be accessed and for what reasons.