Author: David Combes
Published: March 17, 2014
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 11 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
HSE reported a case whereby a company that decommissions fuel tanks committed safety failings leading to an employee being burnt while cutting up a disused fuel tank.
The employee was using a disc cutter to help remove fuel tanks from a former filling station. A spark ignited the residual fuel vapour and the worker needed to be in intensive care for two days with burns to his face and wrist.
In this particular case a gas detector had been used but it appeared it wasn’t correctly calibrated and may have given faulty readings.
HSE suggest cold cutting techniques should have been used instead of a disc cutter. The owner of the business was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay £1,000 costs.
